TY - JOUR
T1 - Ambulation of hospitalized gynecologic surgical patients
T2 - A randomized controlled trial
AU - Liebermann, Maike
AU - Awad, Michael
AU - Dejong, Megan
AU - Rivard, Colleen
AU - Sinacore, James
AU - Brubaker, Linda
PY - 2013/3/1
Y1 - 2013/3/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether specific ambulation goals affect the adequacy or perceived barriers to ambulation in hospitalized surgical patients after major gynecologic surgery. METHODS: One hundred forty-six surgical inpatients were randomized to specific ambulation goals or routine care. We assessed the number of pedometer-recorded steps in the 24 hours preceding discharge as well as patient-identified barriers to ambulation. Groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Of the 129 participants with outcome data, 12% were discharged without any pedometer-recorded steps. We did not detect an effect of specific ambulation goals by group (routine care: 87 compared with ambulation goals: 80, P=.7). The three main barriers to ambulation from a patient perspective were indwelling catheters (38.5%), intravenous poles (28%), and pain (12.5%) The median number of postoperative steps was higher after minimally invasive surgery (143) compared with laparotomy (27) (P=.035). CONCLUSION: Approximately 12% of gynecologic surgical patients do not walk while hospitalized despite formal encouragement to ambulate. Ambulation is easily quantified and may improve with attention to modifiable barriers, potentially improving postoperative recovery.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether specific ambulation goals affect the adequacy or perceived barriers to ambulation in hospitalized surgical patients after major gynecologic surgery. METHODS: One hundred forty-six surgical inpatients were randomized to specific ambulation goals or routine care. We assessed the number of pedometer-recorded steps in the 24 hours preceding discharge as well as patient-identified barriers to ambulation. Groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Of the 129 participants with outcome data, 12% were discharged without any pedometer-recorded steps. We did not detect an effect of specific ambulation goals by group (routine care: 87 compared with ambulation goals: 80, P=.7). The three main barriers to ambulation from a patient perspective were indwelling catheters (38.5%), intravenous poles (28%), and pain (12.5%) The median number of postoperative steps was higher after minimally invasive surgery (143) compared with laparotomy (27) (P=.035). CONCLUSION: Approximately 12% of gynecologic surgical patients do not walk while hospitalized despite formal encouragement to ambulate. Ambulation is easily quantified and may improve with attention to modifiable barriers, potentially improving postoperative recovery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876242638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876242638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318280d50a
DO - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318280d50a
M3 - Article
C2 - 23635615
AN - SCOPUS:84876242638
SN - 0029-7844
VL - 121
SP - 533
EP - 537
JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 3
ER -