Alternatives to Atrazine for Weed Management in Processing Sweet Corn

Zubeyde Filiz Arslan, Martin M. Williams, Roger Becker, Vincent A Fritz, R. Ed Peachey, Tom L. Rabaey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Atrazine has been the most widely used herbicide in North American processing sweet corn for decades; however, increased restrictions in recent years have reduced or eliminated atrazine use in certain production areas. The objective of this study was to identify the best stakeholder-derived weed management alternatives to atrazine in processing sweet corn. In field trials throughout the major production areas of processing sweet corn, including three states over 4 yr, 12 atrazine-free weed management treatments were compared to three standard atrazine-containing treatments and a weed-free check. Treatments varied with respect to herbicide mode of action, herbicide application timing, and interrow cultivation. All treatments included a PRE application of dimethenamid. No single weed species occurred across all sites; however, weeds observed in two or more sites included common lambsquarters, giant ragweed, morningglory species, velvetleaf, and wild-proso millet. Standard treatments containing both atrazine and mesotrione POST provided the most efficacious weed control among treatments and resulted in crop yields comparable to the weed-free check, thus demonstrating the value of atrazine in sweet corn production systems. Timely interrow cultivation in atrazine-free treatments did not consistently improve weed control. Only two atrazine-free treatments consistently resulted in weed control and crop yield comparable to standard treatments with atrazine POST: treatments with tembotrione POST either with or without interrow cultivation. Additional atrazine-free treatments with topramezone applied POST worked well in Oregon where small-seeded weed species were prevalent. This work demonstrates that certain atrazine-free weed management systems, based on input from the sweet corn growers and processors who would adopt this technology, are comparable in performance to standard atrazine-containing weed management systems. Nomenclature: Atrazine; dimethenamid; mesotrione; tembotrione; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L.; giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.; morningglory species, Ipomea spp.; velvetleaf, Abutilon theoprasti Medik.; wild-proso millet, Panicum miliaceum L.; sweet corn, Zea mays L.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-539
Number of pages9
JournalWeed Science
Volume64
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

sweetcorn
atrazine
weed control
weeds
Chenopodium album
tembotrione
dimethenamid
mesotrione
Abutilon theophrasti
management systems
crop yield
topramezone
herbicides
Ambrosia trifida
Abutilon
Panicum miliaceum
application timing
stakeholders
pesticide application
growers

Keywords

  • Herbicide regulation
  • North Central Region
  • Pacific Northwest
  • integrated weed management
  • sweet corn industry

Cite this

Alternatives to Atrazine for Weed Management in Processing Sweet Corn. / Arslan, Zubeyde Filiz; Williams, Martin M.; Becker, Roger; Fritz, Vincent A; Peachey, R. Ed; Rabaey, Tom L.

In: Weed Science, Vol. 64, No. 3, 01.07.2016, p. 531-539.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arslan, Zubeyde Filiz ; Williams, Martin M. ; Becker, Roger ; Fritz, Vincent A ; Peachey, R. Ed ; Rabaey, Tom L. / Alternatives to Atrazine for Weed Management in Processing Sweet Corn. In: Weed Science. 2016 ; Vol. 64, No. 3. pp. 531-539.
@article{9699b0210ad64551af5d112c32d628fb,
title = "Alternatives to Atrazine for Weed Management in Processing Sweet Corn",
abstract = "Atrazine has been the most widely used herbicide in North American processing sweet corn for decades; however, increased restrictions in recent years have reduced or eliminated atrazine use in certain production areas. The objective of this study was to identify the best stakeholder-derived weed management alternatives to atrazine in processing sweet corn. In field trials throughout the major production areas of processing sweet corn, including three states over 4 yr, 12 atrazine-free weed management treatments were compared to three standard atrazine-containing treatments and a weed-free check. Treatments varied with respect to herbicide mode of action, herbicide application timing, and interrow cultivation. All treatments included a PRE application of dimethenamid. No single weed species occurred across all sites; however, weeds observed in two or more sites included common lambsquarters, giant ragweed, morningglory species, velvetleaf, and wild-proso millet. Standard treatments containing both atrazine and mesotrione POST provided the most efficacious weed control among treatments and resulted in crop yields comparable to the weed-free check, thus demonstrating the value of atrazine in sweet corn production systems. Timely interrow cultivation in atrazine-free treatments did not consistently improve weed control. Only two atrazine-free treatments consistently resulted in weed control and crop yield comparable to standard treatments with atrazine POST: treatments with tembotrione POST either with or without interrow cultivation. Additional atrazine-free treatments with topramezone applied POST worked well in Oregon where small-seeded weed species were prevalent. This work demonstrates that certain atrazine-free weed management systems, based on input from the sweet corn growers and processors who would adopt this technology, are comparable in performance to standard atrazine-containing weed management systems. Nomenclature: Atrazine; dimethenamid; mesotrione; tembotrione; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L.; giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.; morningglory species, Ipomea spp.; velvetleaf, Abutilon theoprasti Medik.; wild-proso millet, Panicum miliaceum L.; sweet corn, Zea mays L.",
keywords = "Herbicide regulation, North Central Region, Pacific Northwest, integrated weed management, sweet corn industry",
author = "Arslan, {Zubeyde Filiz} and Williams, {Martin M.} and Roger Becker and Fritz, {Vincent A} and Peachey, {R. Ed} and Rabaey, {Tom L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1614/WS-D-16-00001.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "531--539",
journal = "Weed Science",
issn = "0043-1745",
publisher = "Weed Science Society of America",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alternatives to Atrazine for Weed Management in Processing Sweet Corn

AU - Arslan, Zubeyde Filiz

AU - Williams, Martin M.

AU - Becker, Roger

AU - Fritz, Vincent A

AU - Peachey, R. Ed

AU - Rabaey, Tom L.

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Atrazine has been the most widely used herbicide in North American processing sweet corn for decades; however, increased restrictions in recent years have reduced or eliminated atrazine use in certain production areas. The objective of this study was to identify the best stakeholder-derived weed management alternatives to atrazine in processing sweet corn. In field trials throughout the major production areas of processing sweet corn, including three states over 4 yr, 12 atrazine-free weed management treatments were compared to three standard atrazine-containing treatments and a weed-free check. Treatments varied with respect to herbicide mode of action, herbicide application timing, and interrow cultivation. All treatments included a PRE application of dimethenamid. No single weed species occurred across all sites; however, weeds observed in two or more sites included common lambsquarters, giant ragweed, morningglory species, velvetleaf, and wild-proso millet. Standard treatments containing both atrazine and mesotrione POST provided the most efficacious weed control among treatments and resulted in crop yields comparable to the weed-free check, thus demonstrating the value of atrazine in sweet corn production systems. Timely interrow cultivation in atrazine-free treatments did not consistently improve weed control. Only two atrazine-free treatments consistently resulted in weed control and crop yield comparable to standard treatments with atrazine POST: treatments with tembotrione POST either with or without interrow cultivation. Additional atrazine-free treatments with topramezone applied POST worked well in Oregon where small-seeded weed species were prevalent. This work demonstrates that certain atrazine-free weed management systems, based on input from the sweet corn growers and processors who would adopt this technology, are comparable in performance to standard atrazine-containing weed management systems. Nomenclature: Atrazine; dimethenamid; mesotrione; tembotrione; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L.; giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.; morningglory species, Ipomea spp.; velvetleaf, Abutilon theoprasti Medik.; wild-proso millet, Panicum miliaceum L.; sweet corn, Zea mays L.

AB - Atrazine has been the most widely used herbicide in North American processing sweet corn for decades; however, increased restrictions in recent years have reduced or eliminated atrazine use in certain production areas. The objective of this study was to identify the best stakeholder-derived weed management alternatives to atrazine in processing sweet corn. In field trials throughout the major production areas of processing sweet corn, including three states over 4 yr, 12 atrazine-free weed management treatments were compared to three standard atrazine-containing treatments and a weed-free check. Treatments varied with respect to herbicide mode of action, herbicide application timing, and interrow cultivation. All treatments included a PRE application of dimethenamid. No single weed species occurred across all sites; however, weeds observed in two or more sites included common lambsquarters, giant ragweed, morningglory species, velvetleaf, and wild-proso millet. Standard treatments containing both atrazine and mesotrione POST provided the most efficacious weed control among treatments and resulted in crop yields comparable to the weed-free check, thus demonstrating the value of atrazine in sweet corn production systems. Timely interrow cultivation in atrazine-free treatments did not consistently improve weed control. Only two atrazine-free treatments consistently resulted in weed control and crop yield comparable to standard treatments with atrazine POST: treatments with tembotrione POST either with or without interrow cultivation. Additional atrazine-free treatments with topramezone applied POST worked well in Oregon where small-seeded weed species were prevalent. This work demonstrates that certain atrazine-free weed management systems, based on input from the sweet corn growers and processors who would adopt this technology, are comparable in performance to standard atrazine-containing weed management systems. Nomenclature: Atrazine; dimethenamid; mesotrione; tembotrione; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L.; giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.; morningglory species, Ipomea spp.; velvetleaf, Abutilon theoprasti Medik.; wild-proso millet, Panicum miliaceum L.; sweet corn, Zea mays L.

KW - Herbicide regulation

KW - North Central Region

KW - Pacific Northwest

KW - integrated weed management

KW - sweet corn industry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979544807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979544807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1614/WS-D-16-00001.1

DO - 10.1614/WS-D-16-00001.1

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 531

EP - 539

JO - Weed Science

JF - Weed Science

SN - 0043-1745

IS - 3

ER -