Alternative smart materials

Richard D James, Manfred Wuttig

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Presently, there are three types of smart materials available, ferroelectric-magnetic and -elastic materials. Prototypes of the three are PZT ceramics, Terfenol-D and Nitinol. Their advantages and disadvantages are well known: Ferroelectric materials are characterized by a large elastic constant and moderate actuation strain, and their dynamical response is excellent. Some antiferroelectrics feature a larger actuation strain. Terfenol-D displays similar mechanical characteristics but its dynamical response is limited by eddy currents. This limitation can be overcome in composites. Nitinol and similar shape memory alloys feature a large elastic constant and actuation strain but suffer from inferior dynamical response which can be overcome in small sections. The ideal actuation material would display a large actuation energy and superior dynamical response. Shape memory type materials display the largest actuation strains known. It is thus natural to inquire into the possibility actuating these alloys with a magnetic field to improve their dynamical performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
EditorsVasundara V. Varadan, Jagdish Chandra
Pages420-426
Number of pages7
Volume2715
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996
EventSmart Structures and Materials 1996: Mathematics and Control in Smart Structures - San Diego, CA, USA
Duration: Feb 26 1996Feb 29 1996

Other

OtherSmart Structures and Materials 1996: Mathematics and Control in Smart Structures
CitySan Diego, CA, USA
Period2/26/962/29/96

Fingerprint

Intelligent materials
Elastic constants
Shape memory effect
Ferroelectric materials
Eddy currents
Magnetic fields
Composite materials

Cite this

James, R. D., & Wuttig, M. (1996). Alternative smart materials. In V. V. Varadan, & J. Chandra (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering (Vol. 2715, pp. 420-426)

Alternative smart materials. / James, Richard D; Wuttig, Manfred.

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. ed. / Vasundara V. Varadan; Jagdish Chandra. Vol. 2715 1996. p. 420-426.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

James, RD & Wuttig, M 1996, Alternative smart materials. in VV Varadan & J Chandra (eds), Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. vol. 2715, pp. 420-426, Smart Structures and Materials 1996: Mathematics and Control in Smart Structures, San Diego, CA, USA, 2/26/96.
James RD, Wuttig M. Alternative smart materials. In Varadan VV, Chandra J, editors, Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. Vol. 2715. 1996. p. 420-426
James, Richard D ; Wuttig, Manfred. / Alternative smart materials. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. editor / Vasundara V. Varadan ; Jagdish Chandra. Vol. 2715 1996. pp. 420-426
@inproceedings{7f942465dafb4bdaa71699da2c50d252,
title = "Alternative smart materials",
abstract = "Presently, there are three types of smart materials available, ferroelectric-magnetic and -elastic materials. Prototypes of the three are PZT ceramics, Terfenol-D and Nitinol. Their advantages and disadvantages are well known: Ferroelectric materials are characterized by a large elastic constant and moderate actuation strain, and their dynamical response is excellent. Some antiferroelectrics feature a larger actuation strain. Terfenol-D displays similar mechanical characteristics but its dynamical response is limited by eddy currents. This limitation can be overcome in composites. Nitinol and similar shape memory alloys feature a large elastic constant and actuation strain but suffer from inferior dynamical response which can be overcome in small sections. The ideal actuation material would display a large actuation energy and superior dynamical response. Shape memory type materials display the largest actuation strains known. It is thus natural to inquire into the possibility actuating these alloys with a magnetic field to improve their dynamical performance.",
author = "James, {Richard D} and Manfred Wuttig",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0819420905",
volume = "2715",
pages = "420--426",
editor = "Varadan, {Vasundara V.} and Jagdish Chandra",
booktitle = "Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Alternative smart materials

AU - James, Richard D

AU - Wuttig, Manfred

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Presently, there are three types of smart materials available, ferroelectric-magnetic and -elastic materials. Prototypes of the three are PZT ceramics, Terfenol-D and Nitinol. Their advantages and disadvantages are well known: Ferroelectric materials are characterized by a large elastic constant and moderate actuation strain, and their dynamical response is excellent. Some antiferroelectrics feature a larger actuation strain. Terfenol-D displays similar mechanical characteristics but its dynamical response is limited by eddy currents. This limitation can be overcome in composites. Nitinol and similar shape memory alloys feature a large elastic constant and actuation strain but suffer from inferior dynamical response which can be overcome in small sections. The ideal actuation material would display a large actuation energy and superior dynamical response. Shape memory type materials display the largest actuation strains known. It is thus natural to inquire into the possibility actuating these alloys with a magnetic field to improve their dynamical performance.

AB - Presently, there are three types of smart materials available, ferroelectric-magnetic and -elastic materials. Prototypes of the three are PZT ceramics, Terfenol-D and Nitinol. Their advantages and disadvantages are well known: Ferroelectric materials are characterized by a large elastic constant and moderate actuation strain, and their dynamical response is excellent. Some antiferroelectrics feature a larger actuation strain. Terfenol-D displays similar mechanical characteristics but its dynamical response is limited by eddy currents. This limitation can be overcome in composites. Nitinol and similar shape memory alloys feature a large elastic constant and actuation strain but suffer from inferior dynamical response which can be overcome in small sections. The ideal actuation material would display a large actuation energy and superior dynamical response. Shape memory type materials display the largest actuation strains known. It is thus natural to inquire into the possibility actuating these alloys with a magnetic field to improve their dynamical performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029768288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029768288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 0819420905

SN - 9780819420909

VL - 2715

SP - 420

EP - 426

BT - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

A2 - Varadan, Vasundara V.

A2 - Chandra, Jagdish

ER -