TY - JOUR
T1 - Alternative service delivery models for families with a new speech generating device
T2 - Perspectives of parents and therapists
AU - Anderson, Kate Louise
AU - Balandin, Susan
AU - Stancliffe, Roger James
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Speech Pathology Association of Australia Limited.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - Purpose: Research has revealed limitations in the provision of in-person services to families with a new speech generating device (SGD), both in Australia and overseas. Alternative service models such as parent training, peer support and telepractice may offer a solution, but their use with this population has not been researched to date. Method: Using interviews and focus groups, this study explored the experiences and opinions of 13 speech-language pathologists and seven parents regarding alternatives to in-person support and training for families with a new SGD. Data were analysed using grounded theory. Themes explored in this paper include the benefits and drawbacks of alternative service models as well as participants' suggestions for the optimal implementation of these approaches. Result: Participants confirmed the utility of alternative service models, particularly for rural/remote and underserviced clients. Benefits of these models included reduced travel time for families and therapists, as well as enhanced information access, support and advocacy for parents. Conclusion: Participants viewed the provision of ongoing professional support to families as critical, regardless of service modality. Additional issues arising from this study include the need for development of organizational policies, resources and training infrastructure to support the implementation of these alternative service models.
AB - Purpose: Research has revealed limitations in the provision of in-person services to families with a new speech generating device (SGD), both in Australia and overseas. Alternative service models such as parent training, peer support and telepractice may offer a solution, but their use with this population has not been researched to date. Method: Using interviews and focus groups, this study explored the experiences and opinions of 13 speech-language pathologists and seven parents regarding alternatives to in-person support and training for families with a new SGD. Data were analysed using grounded theory. Themes explored in this paper include the benefits and drawbacks of alternative service models as well as participants' suggestions for the optimal implementation of these approaches. Result: Participants confirmed the utility of alternative service models, particularly for rural/remote and underserviced clients. Benefits of these models included reduced travel time for families and therapists, as well as enhanced information access, support and advocacy for parents. Conclusion: Participants viewed the provision of ongoing professional support to families as critical, regardless of service modality. Additional issues arising from this study include the need for development of organizational policies, resources and training infrastructure to support the implementation of these alternative service models.
KW - Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)
KW - Service delivery
KW - Telepractice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946162484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946162484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/17549507.2014.979876
DO - 10.3109/17549507.2014.979876
M3 - Article
C2 - 25472834
AN - SCOPUS:84946162484
SN - 1754-9515
VL - 17
SP - 185
EP - 195
JO - International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
JF - International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
IS - 2
ER -