Alternative cone-beam computed tomography method for the analysis of bone density around impacted maxillary canines

Jerad A. Servais, Laurence R Gaalaas, Scott A Lunos, Soraya Beiraghi, Brent E Larson, Vladimir Leon-Salazar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Genetic and environmental etiologic factors have been described for maxillary canine impaction, except for the trabecular bone characteristics in the impacted area. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface area and fractal dimension of the alveolar bone on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients with maxillary impacted canines. Methods: The sample comprised preorthodontic treatment CBCT images of 49 participants with maxillary impacted canines (31 unilateral and 18 bilateral). CBCT images were acquired in portrait mode (17 × 23 cm high field of view) at 120 kV, 5 mA, 8.9-seconds exposure time, and 0.3-mm voxel size. Coronal slices (0.3 mm) were obtained from the right and left alveolar processes between the first and second maxillary premolars. We collected 64 × 64-pixel regions of interest between the premolars to assess maxillary bone area and fractal dimension using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md). Comparisons were made using paired t tests and linear regression. Repeated measurements were obtained randomly from about 20% of the sample. Results: In subjects with unilateral impactions, the maxillary bone area (P = 0.0227) was higher in the impacted side, with a mean difference of 245.5 pixels (SD, 569.2), but the fractal dimension (P = 0.9822) was not, −0.0003 pixels (SD, 0.082). Comparisons of unilateral and bilateral subjects using a general linear mixed model test confirmed the increased bone area in the impacted side (P = 0.1062). The repeated measurements showed similar results. Conclusions: The maxillary alveolar bone area is increased in the impacted side compared with the nonimpacted side.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)442-449
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume154
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Fractals
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Maxilla
Bone Density
Canidae
Bicuspid
Linear Models
Alveolar Process
Bone and Bones
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Software
Therapeutics

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Cite this

@article{4abf7cdc6fc64ed2b113d00acb547a29,
title = "Alternative cone-beam computed tomography method for the analysis of bone density around impacted maxillary canines",
abstract = "Introduction: Genetic and environmental etiologic factors have been described for maxillary canine impaction, except for the trabecular bone characteristics in the impacted area. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface area and fractal dimension of the alveolar bone on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients with maxillary impacted canines. Methods: The sample comprised preorthodontic treatment CBCT images of 49 participants with maxillary impacted canines (31 unilateral and 18 bilateral). CBCT images were acquired in portrait mode (17 × 23 cm high field of view) at 120 kV, 5 mA, 8.9-seconds exposure time, and 0.3-mm voxel size. Coronal slices (0.3 mm) were obtained from the right and left alveolar processes between the first and second maxillary premolars. We collected 64 × 64-pixel regions of interest between the premolars to assess maxillary bone area and fractal dimension using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md). Comparisons were made using paired t tests and linear regression. Repeated measurements were obtained randomly from about 20{\%} of the sample. Results: In subjects with unilateral impactions, the maxillary bone area (P = 0.0227) was higher in the impacted side, with a mean difference of 245.5 pixels (SD, 569.2), but the fractal dimension (P = 0.9822) was not, −0.0003 pixels (SD, 0.082). Comparisons of unilateral and bilateral subjects using a general linear mixed model test confirmed the increased bone area in the impacted side (P = 0.1062). The repeated measurements showed similar results. Conclusions: The maxillary alveolar bone area is increased in the impacted side compared with the nonimpacted side.",
author = "Servais, {Jerad A.} and Gaalaas, {Laurence R} and Lunos, {Scott A} and Soraya Beiraghi and Larson, {Brent E} and Vladimir Leon-Salazar",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.01.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "154",
pages = "442--449",
journal = "American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics",
issn = "0889-5406",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alternative cone-beam computed tomography method for the analysis of bone density around impacted maxillary canines

AU - Servais, Jerad A.

AU - Gaalaas, Laurence R

AU - Lunos, Scott A

AU - Beiraghi, Soraya

AU - Larson, Brent E

AU - Leon-Salazar, Vladimir

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Introduction: Genetic and environmental etiologic factors have been described for maxillary canine impaction, except for the trabecular bone characteristics in the impacted area. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface area and fractal dimension of the alveolar bone on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients with maxillary impacted canines. Methods: The sample comprised preorthodontic treatment CBCT images of 49 participants with maxillary impacted canines (31 unilateral and 18 bilateral). CBCT images were acquired in portrait mode (17 × 23 cm high field of view) at 120 kV, 5 mA, 8.9-seconds exposure time, and 0.3-mm voxel size. Coronal slices (0.3 mm) were obtained from the right and left alveolar processes between the first and second maxillary premolars. We collected 64 × 64-pixel regions of interest between the premolars to assess maxillary bone area and fractal dimension using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md). Comparisons were made using paired t tests and linear regression. Repeated measurements were obtained randomly from about 20% of the sample. Results: In subjects with unilateral impactions, the maxillary bone area (P = 0.0227) was higher in the impacted side, with a mean difference of 245.5 pixels (SD, 569.2), but the fractal dimension (P = 0.9822) was not, −0.0003 pixels (SD, 0.082). Comparisons of unilateral and bilateral subjects using a general linear mixed model test confirmed the increased bone area in the impacted side (P = 0.1062). The repeated measurements showed similar results. Conclusions: The maxillary alveolar bone area is increased in the impacted side compared with the nonimpacted side.

AB - Introduction: Genetic and environmental etiologic factors have been described for maxillary canine impaction, except for the trabecular bone characteristics in the impacted area. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface area and fractal dimension of the alveolar bone on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients with maxillary impacted canines. Methods: The sample comprised preorthodontic treatment CBCT images of 49 participants with maxillary impacted canines (31 unilateral and 18 bilateral). CBCT images were acquired in portrait mode (17 × 23 cm high field of view) at 120 kV, 5 mA, 8.9-seconds exposure time, and 0.3-mm voxel size. Coronal slices (0.3 mm) were obtained from the right and left alveolar processes between the first and second maxillary premolars. We collected 64 × 64-pixel regions of interest between the premolars to assess maxillary bone area and fractal dimension using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md). Comparisons were made using paired t tests and linear regression. Repeated measurements were obtained randomly from about 20% of the sample. Results: In subjects with unilateral impactions, the maxillary bone area (P = 0.0227) was higher in the impacted side, with a mean difference of 245.5 pixels (SD, 569.2), but the fractal dimension (P = 0.9822) was not, −0.0003 pixels (SD, 0.082). Comparisons of unilateral and bilateral subjects using a general linear mixed model test confirmed the increased bone area in the impacted side (P = 0.1062). The repeated measurements showed similar results. Conclusions: The maxillary alveolar bone area is increased in the impacted side compared with the nonimpacted side.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052507629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052507629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.01.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.01.008

M3 - Article

VL - 154

SP - 442

EP - 449

JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SN - 0889-5406

IS - 3

ER -