TY - JOUR
T1 - Alopecia areata
T2 - An evidence-based treatment update
AU - Hordinsky, Maria
AU - Donati, Aline
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - Background: There is no cure for alopecia areata, nor is there any universally proven therapy that induces and sustains remission. Treatment choices are frequently based on disease duration, extent, and activity as well as the age of the patient. Objective: Our objective was to review all randomized controlled studies on the treatment of alopecia areata. Methods: We performed a search in the biomedical literature database PubMed, and used the terms 'alopecia areata treatment' and article type 'randomized controlled trials'. Results: Following this algorithm, we reviewed, analyzed, and reported on 29 trials that examined the efficacy of anthralin, antidepressants, biologics, calcineurin inhibitors, corticosteroids (topical and systemic), minoxidil, prostaglandin analogs, sensitizers, and a miscellaneous group of topical and oral drugs with less scientific evidence (aromatherapy, photodynamic therapy, azelaic acid, garlic gel, bexarotene, triiodothyronine, inosiplex, and total glucosides of paeony). Conclusion: Using the American College of Physicians Guideline grading system, our assessment is that the majority of published randomized controlled studies of alopecia areata are only of moderate quality. A number of treatments were found to be effective, for example, topical and oral corticosteroids and the sensitizing agents diphenylcyclopropenone and dinitrochlorobenzene; however, most studies had major limitations that hinder the interpretation of these results.
AB - Background: There is no cure for alopecia areata, nor is there any universally proven therapy that induces and sustains remission. Treatment choices are frequently based on disease duration, extent, and activity as well as the age of the patient. Objective: Our objective was to review all randomized controlled studies on the treatment of alopecia areata. Methods: We performed a search in the biomedical literature database PubMed, and used the terms 'alopecia areata treatment' and article type 'randomized controlled trials'. Results: Following this algorithm, we reviewed, analyzed, and reported on 29 trials that examined the efficacy of anthralin, antidepressants, biologics, calcineurin inhibitors, corticosteroids (topical and systemic), minoxidil, prostaglandin analogs, sensitizers, and a miscellaneous group of topical and oral drugs with less scientific evidence (aromatherapy, photodynamic therapy, azelaic acid, garlic gel, bexarotene, triiodothyronine, inosiplex, and total glucosides of paeony). Conclusion: Using the American College of Physicians Guideline grading system, our assessment is that the majority of published randomized controlled studies of alopecia areata are only of moderate quality. A number of treatments were found to be effective, for example, topical and oral corticosteroids and the sensitizing agents diphenylcyclopropenone and dinitrochlorobenzene; however, most studies had major limitations that hinder the interpretation of these results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904310023&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904310023&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40257-014-0086-4
DO - 10.1007/s40257-014-0086-4
M3 - Review article
C2 - 25000998
AN - SCOPUS:84904310023
VL - 15
SP - 231
EP - 246
JO - American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
JF - American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
SN - 1175-0561
IS - 3
ER -