TY - JOUR
T1 - Allometric scaling of body mass in running economy data
T2 - An important consideration in modeling marathon performance
AU - Lundstrom, Christopher John
AU - Biltz, George R.
AU - Snyder, Eric M.
AU - Ingraham, Stacy Jean
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Faculty of Education. University of Alicante.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare metabolic variables during submaximal running as predictors of marathon performance. Running economy (RE) and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) data were gathered during a 30 min incremental treadmill run completed within 2 weeks prior to running a 42.2-km marathon. Paces during the treadmill run progressed every 5 min from 75-100% of 10-km race velocity. Variables at each stage were analyzed as predictors of relative marathon performance (RMP) in competitive (COMP) and recreational (REC) runners. Twenty-nine runners were classified as COMP (n = 12; age 30 ± 8 years) or REC (n =17; age 20 ± 1 year) based on performance in shorter races. RMP was calculated as percent difference from predicted marathon finish time. Two methods of calculating RE were used: unscaled (ml·kg-1·km-1) and with allometric scaling of body mass (ml·kg-0.75·km-1). The COMP runners were significantly more economical than REC (p=0.005; p=0.015 with scaling). For the whole population, RE with and without scaling was significantly correlated with RMP. Within groups, RMP was not significantly correlated with RE unless scaling was used: COMP runners at 75% (p=0.044), 80% (p=0.040), and REC runners at 85% (p=0.038). Runners classified as COMP were more economical than REC, but RER was not different. The use of allometric scaling is important when assessing homogeneous groups. In this study, allometrically-scaled RE at 80-85% of 10-km velocity was the best predictor of RMP within groups.
AB - The purpose of this study was to compare metabolic variables during submaximal running as predictors of marathon performance. Running economy (RE) and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) data were gathered during a 30 min incremental treadmill run completed within 2 weeks prior to running a 42.2-km marathon. Paces during the treadmill run progressed every 5 min from 75-100% of 10-km race velocity. Variables at each stage were analyzed as predictors of relative marathon performance (RMP) in competitive (COMP) and recreational (REC) runners. Twenty-nine runners were classified as COMP (n = 12; age 30 ± 8 years) or REC (n =17; age 20 ± 1 year) based on performance in shorter races. RMP was calculated as percent difference from predicted marathon finish time. Two methods of calculating RE were used: unscaled (ml·kg-1·km-1) and with allometric scaling of body mass (ml·kg-0.75·km-1). The COMP runners were significantly more economical than REC (p=0.005; p=0.015 with scaling). For the whole population, RE with and without scaling was significantly correlated with RMP. Within groups, RMP was not significantly correlated with RE unless scaling was used: COMP runners at 75% (p=0.044), 80% (p=0.040), and REC runners at 85% (p=0.038). Runners classified as COMP were more economical than REC, but RER was not different. The use of allometric scaling is important when assessing homogeneous groups. In this study, allometrically-scaled RE at 80-85% of 10-km velocity was the best predictor of RMP within groups.
KW - Distance running
KW - Endurance training
KW - Exercise efficiency
KW - Oxygen kinetics
KW - Respiratory exchange ratio
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021990353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021990353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14198/jhse.2017.122.03
DO - 10.14198/jhse.2017.122.03
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85021990353
SN - 1988-5202
VL - 12
SP - 267
EP - 275
JO - Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
JF - Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
IS - 2
ER -