Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

All-Inside Meniscal Implant Placement and Risks of Neurovascular Injury: An Arthroscopic, Pediatric Anatomic Study

  • Henry B.G. Baird
  • , Yi Meng Yen
  • , Wills Baird
  • , Vanessa Taylor
  • , Nicholas Thomas
  • , Chiamaka Obilo
  • , Dane Lind
  • , Cassidy Schultz
  • , Morgan Swanson
  • , Jennifer Beck
  • , Corinna Franklin
  • , Kevin Landrum
  • , Marc Tompkins
  • , Matthew Schmitz
  • , Philip Wilson
  • , Theodore Ganley
  • , Henry B. Ellis
  • , Kevin Shea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Pediatric meniscal injury rates and their arthroscopic repair are on the rise. With the growing popularity of all-inside devices used in this potentially higher-risk population, studies examining the proximity of these devices to neurovascular structures are needed. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to provide distances to neurovascular structures from all-inside devices placed arthroscopically at both high-risk approach angles and zones of the lateral menisci of pediatric cadaveric specimens. It was hypothesized that the neurovascular structures would be situated closely to arthroscopically placed all-inside lateral meniscal devices, particularly the popliteal artery (PA), popliteal vein (PV), and tibial nerve (TN) to devices placed at the posterior root when placed via a lateral portal, as well as the peroneal nerve (PN) to devices placed just medial to the popliteal hiatus via a medial portal. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: The study involved 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens (6 matched pairs) between the ages of 6 and 10. Two all-inside meniscal repair implants were placed in the lateral meniscus: 1 via a medial port just medial to the popliteal hiatus and 1 via a lateral port at the visible edge of the posterior root. Specimens were then dissected posteriorly to expose the posterior knee capsule and meniscal implants. The distance measurements between the implants and the PA, PV, TN, and PN were recorded. Results: The distances from the anchors to the PA, PV, TN, and PN ranged from 2.3 to 59.8 mm, 3.5 to 58.0 mm, 5.3 to 63.0 mm, and 6.3 to 40.1 mm, respectively. Implants at the meniscus root were closer to the PA, PV, and TN than implants at the popliteal hiatus (P≤ .001 for all). There was no statistically significant difference in distances to the PN between the 2 implant positions (P = .06). Conclusion: This study illustrates the proximity of neurovascular structures to all-inside devices in pediatric knee specimens, particularly those directed at the posterior horn using the anterolateral portal. Under the conditions of this study, all-inside devices appeared to be safe. Clinical Relevance: This study provides much-needed data to the growing body of knowledge regarding meniscal injuries and repair in the pediatric population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume13
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

Keywords

  • all-inside devices
  • anatomy
  • injury prevention
  • knee, meniscus
  • neurovascular injury
  • pediatric sports medicine

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'All-Inside Meniscal Implant Placement and Risks of Neurovascular Injury: An Arthroscopic, Pediatric Anatomic Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this