Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

AI chatbot interventions in combatting marijuana-impaired driving: the role of gender, linguistic style, and hypocrisy induction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of AI chatbots in public safety advertising campaigns against marijuana-impaired driving, specifically focusing on the role of hypocrisy induction, gender, and linguistic styles. In our online experiment, participants engaged with a chatbot delivering either hypocrisy-inducing or neutral messages about driving under marijuana influence. The chatbot, characterized as male or female, utilized either formal or casual language. Results revealed that hypocrisy induction is most effective when delivered by a casually speaking female chatbot or a formally speaking male chatbot. The heightened guilt among participants explains the effectiveness of this approach. The Language Expectancy Theory (LET) serves as a theoretical framework, elucidating how the alignment of chatbot gender and linguistic style enhances the hypocrisy induction effect. This research highlights the potency of AI chatbots in leveraging public safety advertising campaigns and offers guidance on optimizing their design by aligning gender and language style with campaign goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1311-1340
Number of pages30
JournalInternational Journal of Advertising
Volume44
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Advertising Association.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Hypocrisy induction
  • artificial intelligence
  • chatbot
  • gender
  • guilt
  • language style
  • marijuana

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'AI chatbot interventions in combatting marijuana-impaired driving: the role of gender, linguistic style, and hypocrisy induction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this