Agent-based modeling to inform online community design: Impact of topical breadth, message volume, and discussion moderation on member commitment and contribution

Yuqing Ren, Robert E. Kraut

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The design of complex social systems, such as online communities, requires the consideration of many parameters, a practice at odds with social science research that focuses on the effects of a small set of variables. In this article, we show how synthesizing insights from multiple, narrowly focused social science theories in an agent-based model helps us understand factors that lead to the success of online communities. The agent-based model combines insights from theories related to collective effort, information overload, social identity, and interpersonal attraction to predict motivations for online community participation. We conducted virtual experiments to develop hypotheses around three design decisions about how to orchestrate an online community - topical breadth, message volume, and discussion moderation - and the trade-offs involved in making these decisions. The simulation experiments suggest that broad topics and high message volume can lead to higher member commitment. Personalized moderation outperforms other types of moderation in increasing members' commitment and contribution, especially in topically broad communities and those with high message volume. In comparison, community-level moderation increases commitment but not contribution, and only in topically narrow communities. These simulation results suggest a critical trade-off between informational and relational benefits. This research illustrates that there are many interactions among the design decisions that are important to consider; the particulars of the community's goals often determine the effectiveness of some decisions. It also demonstrates the value of agent-based modeling in synthesizing simple social science theories to describe and prescribe behaviors in a complex system, generating novel insights that inform the design of online communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)351-389
Number of pages39
JournalHuman-Computer Interaction
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 4 2014

Fingerprint

Social Sciences
Systems Analysis
Social sciences
Social Identification
Research
Motivation
Decision Making
Large scale systems
Decision making
Experiments
Social Theory

Cite this

@article{c770ba5ad67f49d9b6696b09ec8affb1,
title = "Agent-based modeling to inform online community design: Impact of topical breadth, message volume, and discussion moderation on member commitment and contribution",
abstract = "The design of complex social systems, such as online communities, requires the consideration of many parameters, a practice at odds with social science research that focuses on the effects of a small set of variables. In this article, we show how synthesizing insights from multiple, narrowly focused social science theories in an agent-based model helps us understand factors that lead to the success of online communities. The agent-based model combines insights from theories related to collective effort, information overload, social identity, and interpersonal attraction to predict motivations for online community participation. We conducted virtual experiments to develop hypotheses around three design decisions about how to orchestrate an online community - topical breadth, message volume, and discussion moderation - and the trade-offs involved in making these decisions. The simulation experiments suggest that broad topics and high message volume can lead to higher member commitment. Personalized moderation outperforms other types of moderation in increasing members' commitment and contribution, especially in topically broad communities and those with high message volume. In comparison, community-level moderation increases commitment but not contribution, and only in topically narrow communities. These simulation results suggest a critical trade-off between informational and relational benefits. This research illustrates that there are many interactions among the design decisions that are important to consider; the particulars of the community's goals often determine the effectiveness of some decisions. It also demonstrates the value of agent-based modeling in synthesizing simple social science theories to describe and prescribe behaviors in a complex system, generating novel insights that inform the design of online communities.",
author = "Yuqing Ren and Kraut, {Robert E.}",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/07370024.2013.828565",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "351--389",
journal = "Human-Computer Interaction",
issn = "0737-0024",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agent-based modeling to inform online community design

T2 - Impact of topical breadth, message volume, and discussion moderation on member commitment and contribution

AU - Ren, Yuqing

AU - Kraut, Robert E.

PY - 2014/7/4

Y1 - 2014/7/4

N2 - The design of complex social systems, such as online communities, requires the consideration of many parameters, a practice at odds with social science research that focuses on the effects of a small set of variables. In this article, we show how synthesizing insights from multiple, narrowly focused social science theories in an agent-based model helps us understand factors that lead to the success of online communities. The agent-based model combines insights from theories related to collective effort, information overload, social identity, and interpersonal attraction to predict motivations for online community participation. We conducted virtual experiments to develop hypotheses around three design decisions about how to orchestrate an online community - topical breadth, message volume, and discussion moderation - and the trade-offs involved in making these decisions. The simulation experiments suggest that broad topics and high message volume can lead to higher member commitment. Personalized moderation outperforms other types of moderation in increasing members' commitment and contribution, especially in topically broad communities and those with high message volume. In comparison, community-level moderation increases commitment but not contribution, and only in topically narrow communities. These simulation results suggest a critical trade-off between informational and relational benefits. This research illustrates that there are many interactions among the design decisions that are important to consider; the particulars of the community's goals often determine the effectiveness of some decisions. It also demonstrates the value of agent-based modeling in synthesizing simple social science theories to describe and prescribe behaviors in a complex system, generating novel insights that inform the design of online communities.

AB - The design of complex social systems, such as online communities, requires the consideration of many parameters, a practice at odds with social science research that focuses on the effects of a small set of variables. In this article, we show how synthesizing insights from multiple, narrowly focused social science theories in an agent-based model helps us understand factors that lead to the success of online communities. The agent-based model combines insights from theories related to collective effort, information overload, social identity, and interpersonal attraction to predict motivations for online community participation. We conducted virtual experiments to develop hypotheses around three design decisions about how to orchestrate an online community - topical breadth, message volume, and discussion moderation - and the trade-offs involved in making these decisions. The simulation experiments suggest that broad topics and high message volume can lead to higher member commitment. Personalized moderation outperforms other types of moderation in increasing members' commitment and contribution, especially in topically broad communities and those with high message volume. In comparison, community-level moderation increases commitment but not contribution, and only in topically narrow communities. These simulation results suggest a critical trade-off between informational and relational benefits. This research illustrates that there are many interactions among the design decisions that are important to consider; the particulars of the community's goals often determine the effectiveness of some decisions. It also demonstrates the value of agent-based modeling in synthesizing simple social science theories to describe and prescribe behaviors in a complex system, generating novel insights that inform the design of online communities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899743846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899743846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07370024.2013.828565

DO - 10.1080/07370024.2013.828565

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84899743846

VL - 29

SP - 351

EP - 389

JO - Human-Computer Interaction

JF - Human-Computer Interaction

SN - 0737-0024

IS - 4

ER -