Abstract
In this article, I argue that affordances are properties of the animal-environment system, that is, that they are emergent properties that do not inhere in either the environment or the animal. I critique and review the formal definition of affordance offered by Turvey (1992). Turvey defined affordances as properties of the environment; I discuss some consequences of this and argue that Turvey's strategy of grounding the definition of affordance in terms of dispositional properties is problematic. I also suggest that Turvey's definition of affordance may lead to problems for the specification and direct perception of affordances. Motivated by these problems, I propose a new definition of affordance, in which affordances are properties of the animal-environment system. This definition does not rely on the concept of dispositional properties and is consistent with direct perception.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 115-134 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Ecological Psychology |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2003 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Affordances as Properties of the Animal-Environment System'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS