Affordable care act's mandate eliminating contraceptive cost sharing influenced choices of women with employer coverage

Caroline S Carlin, Angela R. Fertig, Bryan E Dowd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patient cost sharing for contraceptive prescriptions was eliminated for certain insurance plans as part of the Affordable Care Act. We examined the impact of this change on women's patterns of choosing prescription contraceptive methods. Using claims data for a sample of midwestern women ages 18-46 with employer-sponsored coverage, we examined the contraceptive choices made by women in employer groups whose coverage complied with the mandate, compared to the choices of women in groups whose coverage did not comply. We found that the reduction in cost sharing was associated with a 2.3-percentage-point increase in the choice of any prescription contraceptive, relative to the 30 percent rate of choosing prescription contraceptives before the change in cost sharing. A disproportionate share of this increase came from increased selection of long-term contraception methods. Thus, the removal of cost as a barrier seems to be an important factor in contraceptive choice, and our findings about long-term methods may have implications for rates of unintended pregnancy that require further study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1608-1615
Number of pages8
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume35
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Cost Sharing
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Contraceptive Agents
Prescriptions
Contraception
Pregnancy Rate
Insurance
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

Affordable care act's mandate eliminating contraceptive cost sharing influenced choices of women with employer coverage. / Carlin, Caroline S; Fertig, Angela R.; Dowd, Bryan E.

In: Health Affairs, Vol. 35, No. 9, 01.01.2016, p. 1608-1615.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c64169ac05c24cb5a24bbf396f835069,
title = "Affordable care act's mandate eliminating contraceptive cost sharing influenced choices of women with employer coverage",
abstract = "Patient cost sharing for contraceptive prescriptions was eliminated for certain insurance plans as part of the Affordable Care Act. We examined the impact of this change on women's patterns of choosing prescription contraceptive methods. Using claims data for a sample of midwestern women ages 18-46 with employer-sponsored coverage, we examined the contraceptive choices made by women in employer groups whose coverage complied with the mandate, compared to the choices of women in groups whose coverage did not comply. We found that the reduction in cost sharing was associated with a 2.3-percentage-point increase in the choice of any prescription contraceptive, relative to the 30 percent rate of choosing prescription contraceptives before the change in cost sharing. A disproportionate share of this increase came from increased selection of long-term contraception methods. Thus, the removal of cost as a barrier seems to be an important factor in contraceptive choice, and our findings about long-term methods may have implications for rates of unintended pregnancy that require further study.",
author = "Carlin, {Caroline S} and Fertig, {Angela R.} and Dowd, {Bryan E}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1457",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1608--1615",
journal = "Health Affairs",
issn = "0278-2715",
publisher = "Project Hope",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Affordable care act's mandate eliminating contraceptive cost sharing influenced choices of women with employer coverage

AU - Carlin, Caroline S

AU - Fertig, Angela R.

AU - Dowd, Bryan E

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Patient cost sharing for contraceptive prescriptions was eliminated for certain insurance plans as part of the Affordable Care Act. We examined the impact of this change on women's patterns of choosing prescription contraceptive methods. Using claims data for a sample of midwestern women ages 18-46 with employer-sponsored coverage, we examined the contraceptive choices made by women in employer groups whose coverage complied with the mandate, compared to the choices of women in groups whose coverage did not comply. We found that the reduction in cost sharing was associated with a 2.3-percentage-point increase in the choice of any prescription contraceptive, relative to the 30 percent rate of choosing prescription contraceptives before the change in cost sharing. A disproportionate share of this increase came from increased selection of long-term contraception methods. Thus, the removal of cost as a barrier seems to be an important factor in contraceptive choice, and our findings about long-term methods may have implications for rates of unintended pregnancy that require further study.

AB - Patient cost sharing for contraceptive prescriptions was eliminated for certain insurance plans as part of the Affordable Care Act. We examined the impact of this change on women's patterns of choosing prescription contraceptive methods. Using claims data for a sample of midwestern women ages 18-46 with employer-sponsored coverage, we examined the contraceptive choices made by women in employer groups whose coverage complied with the mandate, compared to the choices of women in groups whose coverage did not comply. We found that the reduction in cost sharing was associated with a 2.3-percentage-point increase in the choice of any prescription contraceptive, relative to the 30 percent rate of choosing prescription contraceptives before the change in cost sharing. A disproportionate share of this increase came from increased selection of long-term contraception methods. Thus, the removal of cost as a barrier seems to be an important factor in contraceptive choice, and our findings about long-term methods may have implications for rates of unintended pregnancy that require further study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988432004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988432004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1457

DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1457

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 1608

EP - 1615

JO - Health Affairs

JF - Health Affairs

SN - 0278-2715

IS - 9

ER -