Advocacy coalitions and punctuated equilibrium in the same-sex marriage debate: Learning from pro-lgbt policy changes in minneapolis and minnesota

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Policy change to actualize same-sex marriage requires planning and practices that can be most effective to advance marriage equality. This case study examines how building and maintaining strong coalitions aided in attainment and preservation of civil rights and protections for same-sex couples in Minnesota. As a historical policy analysis, it dissects collaborative strategies and events that led to a municipal domestic partner ordinance and state civil rights protections for sexual minorities in Minnesota during 1983-1995. Viewed through the lens of Advocacy Coalition Framework and Punctuated Equilibrium theory, findings support and highlight the importance of strategic planning of developing capable leaders, building strong coalitions, and capitalizing on events to garner public support and advance public policy toward civil rights protections and legal recognition for same-sex couples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-182
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services
Volume22
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2010

Keywords

  • Advocacy coalitions
  • Domestic partner benefits
  • Gay
  • Lesbian
  • Policy
  • Punctuated equilibrium

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Advocacy coalitions and punctuated equilibrium in the same-sex marriage debate: Learning from pro-lgbt policy changes in minneapolis and minnesota'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this