Adolescents’ Judgment of Homophobic Name-Calling: The Role of Peer/Friend Context and Emotional Response

Yueyao Wang; Christopher Marosi; Megan Edgin; Stacey S. Horn

doi:10.1007/s10964-021-01470-8

Adolescents’ Judgment of Homophobic Name-Calling: The Role of Peer/Friend Context and Emotional Response

Yueyao Wang, Christopher Marosi, Megan Edgin, Stacey S. Horn

Family Social Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Adolescents use some types of homophobic language (e.g., “that’s so gay”) as a form of banter, while other types are directly targeted as an intentional insult (e.g., calling someone a “fag, dyke, homo”). Little research has investigated adolescents’ use and judgments about these types of homophobic language and whether judgments differ if they are used among friends or directed toward non-friend peers. This study investigated how relationship context and victim’s (N = 477, M_age = 14.7, SD = 1.63) emotional responses related to judgments about anti-gay banter and homophobic name-calling. Adolescents evaluated homophobic name-calling as more wrong than anti-gay banter. While adolescents’ evaluations of homophobic name-calling did not differ based on relationship context, adolescents did differentiate between anti-gay banter perpetrated by a friend vs. a peer. Further, emotional responses mediated these relationships in the anti-gay banter situation. These results suggest that adolescents’ judgments about homophobic language are related to the relationship context and the type of homophobic language used.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1939-1951
Number of pages	13
Journal	Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Volume	50
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01470-8
State	Published - Oct 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank the entire Safe SPACES research team for their contributions to the overall project: Emilia Chico, Boyd Bellinger, Nicole Darcangelo, Karen Drill, Fausto Lopez, Christina Peters, Tim Tasker. In addition, we thank the Illinois Safe Schools Alliance for their collaboration on the grant and most especially, Shannon Sullivan, David Fischer, and Sarah Schriber (former staff at the Alliance). Y.W. conceived of the current study, participated in statistical analysis and drafted the paper; C.M. and M.E. participated in the management of the data and drafted the paper; S.H. served as PI on the larger project and oversaw measure development, data collection, and data management; conceived of the current study; participated in its design and coordination; and helped to draft the paper. All authors have read and approved the final paper. This project was funded in part through two grants from the Ford Foundation granted to the last author: 20161100.2774.0 and 20171120.2774.0. This paper data will not be deposited.

Funding Information:
This project was funded in part through two grants from the Ford Foundation granted to the last author: 20161100.2774.0 and 20171120.2774.0.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

Adolescents
Emotional Response
Homophobic Language
Relationship Context
Social Cognitive Domain Theory

PubMed: MeSH publication types

Journal Article

Publisher link

10.1007/s10964-021-01470-8

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{3940771e266f46a38b8a7b0c5dfd3972,

title = "Adolescents{\textquoteright} Judgment of Homophobic Name-Calling: The Role of Peer/Friend Context and Emotional Response",

abstract = "Adolescents use some types of homophobic language (e.g., “that{\textquoteright}s so gay”) as a form of banter, while other types are directly targeted as an intentional insult (e.g., calling someone a “fag, dyke, homo”). Little research has investigated adolescents{\textquoteright} use and judgments about these types of homophobic language and whether judgments differ if they are used among friends or directed toward non-friend peers. This study investigated how relationship context and victim{\textquoteright}s (N = 477, Mage = 14.7, SD = 1.63) emotional responses related to judgments about anti-gay banter and homophobic name-calling. Adolescents evaluated homophobic name-calling as more wrong than anti-gay banter. While adolescents{\textquoteright} evaluations of homophobic name-calling did not differ based on relationship context, adolescents did differentiate between anti-gay banter perpetrated by a friend vs. a peer. Further, emotional responses mediated these relationships in the anti-gay banter situation. These results suggest that adolescents{\textquoteright} judgments about homophobic language are related to the relationship context and the type of homophobic language used.",

keywords = "Adolescents, Emotional Response, Homophobic Language, Relationship Context, Social Cognitive Domain Theory",

author = "Yueyao Wang and Christopher Marosi and Megan Edgin and Horn, {Stacey S.}",

note = "Funding Information: We thank the entire Safe SPACES research team for their contributions to the overall project: Emilia Chico, Boyd Bellinger, Nicole Darcangelo, Karen Drill, Fausto Lopez, Christina Peters, Tim Tasker. In addition, we thank the Illinois Safe Schools Alliance for their collaboration on the grant and most especially, Shannon Sullivan, David Fischer, and Sarah Schriber (former staff at the Alliance). Y.W. conceived of the current study, participated in statistical analysis and drafted the paper; C.M. and M.E. participated in the management of the data and drafted the paper; S.H. served as PI on the larger project and oversaw measure development, data collection, and data management; conceived of the current study; participated in its design and coordination; and helped to draft the paper. All authors have read and approved the final paper. This project was funded in part through two grants from the Ford Foundation granted to the last author: 20161100.2774.0 and 20171120.2774.0. This paper data will not be deposited. Funding Information: This project was funded in part through two grants from the Ford Foundation granted to the last author: 20161100.2774.0 and 20171120.2774.0. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.",

year = "2021",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1007/s10964-021-01470-8",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "50",

pages = "1939--1951",

journal = "Journal of Youth and Adolescence",

issn = "0047-2891",

publisher = "Springer New York",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adolescents’ Judgment of Homophobic Name-Calling

T2 - The Role of Peer/Friend Context and Emotional Response

AU - Wang, Yueyao

AU - Marosi, Christopher

AU - Edgin, Megan

AU - Horn, Stacey S.

N1 - Funding Information: We thank the entire Safe SPACES research team for their contributions to the overall project: Emilia Chico, Boyd Bellinger, Nicole Darcangelo, Karen Drill, Fausto Lopez, Christina Peters, Tim Tasker. In addition, we thank the Illinois Safe Schools Alliance for their collaboration on the grant and most especially, Shannon Sullivan, David Fischer, and Sarah Schriber (former staff at the Alliance). Y.W. conceived of the current study, participated in statistical analysis and drafted the paper; C.M. and M.E. participated in the management of the data and drafted the paper; S.H. served as PI on the larger project and oversaw measure development, data collection, and data management; conceived of the current study; participated in its design and coordination; and helped to draft the paper. All authors have read and approved the final paper. This project was funded in part through two grants from the Ford Foundation granted to the last author: 20161100.2774.0 and 20171120.2774.0. This paper data will not be deposited. Funding Information: This project was funded in part through two grants from the Ford Foundation granted to the last author: 20161100.2774.0 and 20171120.2774.0. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

PY - 2021/10

Y1 - 2021/10

N2 - Adolescents use some types of homophobic language (e.g., “that’s so gay”) as a form of banter, while other types are directly targeted as an intentional insult (e.g., calling someone a “fag, dyke, homo”). Little research has investigated adolescents’ use and judgments about these types of homophobic language and whether judgments differ if they are used among friends or directed toward non-friend peers. This study investigated how relationship context and victim’s (N = 477, Mage = 14.7, SD = 1.63) emotional responses related to judgments about anti-gay banter and homophobic name-calling. Adolescents evaluated homophobic name-calling as more wrong than anti-gay banter. While adolescents’ evaluations of homophobic name-calling did not differ based on relationship context, adolescents did differentiate between anti-gay banter perpetrated by a friend vs. a peer. Further, emotional responses mediated these relationships in the anti-gay banter situation. These results suggest that adolescents’ judgments about homophobic language are related to the relationship context and the type of homophobic language used.

AB - Adolescents use some types of homophobic language (e.g., “that’s so gay”) as a form of banter, while other types are directly targeted as an intentional insult (e.g., calling someone a “fag, dyke, homo”). Little research has investigated adolescents’ use and judgments about these types of homophobic language and whether judgments differ if they are used among friends or directed toward non-friend peers. This study investigated how relationship context and victim’s (N = 477, Mage = 14.7, SD = 1.63) emotional responses related to judgments about anti-gay banter and homophobic name-calling. Adolescents evaluated homophobic name-calling as more wrong than anti-gay banter. While adolescents’ evaluations of homophobic name-calling did not differ based on relationship context, adolescents did differentiate between anti-gay banter perpetrated by a friend vs. a peer. Further, emotional responses mediated these relationships in the anti-gay banter situation. These results suggest that adolescents’ judgments about homophobic language are related to the relationship context and the type of homophobic language used.

KW - Adolescents

KW - Emotional Response

KW - Homophobic Language

KW - Relationship Context

KW - Social Cognitive Domain Theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110514319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85110514319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10964-021-01470-8

DO - 10.1007/s10964-021-01470-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 34245427

AN - SCOPUS:85110514319

SN - 0047-2891

VL - 50

SP - 1939

EP - 1951

JO - Journal of Youth and Adolescence

JF - Journal of Youth and Adolescence

IS - 10

ER -

Adolescents’ Judgment of Homophobic Name-Calling: The Role of Peer/Friend Context and Emotional Response

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

PubMed: MeSH publication types

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this