Addressing key concerns regarding automated speed enforcement via interactive survey

Colleen Peterson, Frank P Douma, Nichole L Morris

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Speeding is a public health crisis that accounts for approximately onethird of roadway deaths each year in the United States. One countermeasure with clearly documented efficacy to reduce speed is automated speed enforcement (ASE). Public acceptance, however, has been marginal, with many drivers calling into question its need and legality. This project aimed to measure public rejection of ASE and to provide individualized information strategically to determine if opinions may be shifted more favorably as a result. Statistically significant movement on ASE opinion was achieved after respondents engaged with a tailored survey that addressed their particular concerns about ASE. Almost half (47%) of those who began with a neutral or negative opinion of ASE moved toward a more favorable opinion of it. Those who changed their opinion were more engaged (e.g., considered the opposite of their current stance more fully) and were persuaded by evidence of safety benefits that result from effective speed reduction with ASE deployment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationOperator Education and Regulation; Safe Mobility for Older Persons; Traffic Enforcement; Occupant Protection; Alcohol and Drugs
PublisherNational Research Council
Pages66-73
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)9780309441797
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Publication series

NameTransportation Research Record
Volume2660
ISSN (Print)0361-1981

Fingerprint

Public health

Cite this

Peterson, C., Douma, F. P., & Morris, N. L. (2017). Addressing key concerns regarding automated speed enforcement via interactive survey. In Operator Education and Regulation; Safe Mobility for Older Persons; Traffic Enforcement; Occupant Protection; Alcohol and Drugs (pp. 66-73). (Transportation Research Record; Vol. 2660). National Research Council. https://doi.org/10.3141/2660-09

Addressing key concerns regarding automated speed enforcement via interactive survey. / Peterson, Colleen; Douma, Frank P; Morris, Nichole L.

Operator Education and Regulation; Safe Mobility for Older Persons; Traffic Enforcement; Occupant Protection; Alcohol and Drugs. National Research Council, 2017. p. 66-73 (Transportation Research Record; Vol. 2660).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Peterson, C, Douma, FP & Morris, NL 2017, Addressing key concerns regarding automated speed enforcement via interactive survey. in Operator Education and Regulation; Safe Mobility for Older Persons; Traffic Enforcement; Occupant Protection; Alcohol and Drugs. Transportation Research Record, vol. 2660, National Research Council, pp. 66-73. https://doi.org/10.3141/2660-09
Peterson C, Douma FP, Morris NL. Addressing key concerns regarding automated speed enforcement via interactive survey. In Operator Education and Regulation; Safe Mobility for Older Persons; Traffic Enforcement; Occupant Protection; Alcohol and Drugs. National Research Council. 2017. p. 66-73. (Transportation Research Record). https://doi.org/10.3141/2660-09
Peterson, Colleen ; Douma, Frank P ; Morris, Nichole L. / Addressing key concerns regarding automated speed enforcement via interactive survey. Operator Education and Regulation; Safe Mobility for Older Persons; Traffic Enforcement; Occupant Protection; Alcohol and Drugs. National Research Council, 2017. pp. 66-73 (Transportation Research Record).
@inbook{fc35cd71d4494e31ac77abe6a5b7cbbe,
title = "Addressing key concerns regarding automated speed enforcement via interactive survey",
abstract = "Speeding is a public health crisis that accounts for approximately onethird of roadway deaths each year in the United States. One countermeasure with clearly documented efficacy to reduce speed is automated speed enforcement (ASE). Public acceptance, however, has been marginal, with many drivers calling into question its need and legality. This project aimed to measure public rejection of ASE and to provide individualized information strategically to determine if opinions may be shifted more favorably as a result. Statistically significant movement on ASE opinion was achieved after respondents engaged with a tailored survey that addressed their particular concerns about ASE. Almost half (47{\%}) of those who began with a neutral or negative opinion of ASE moved toward a more favorable opinion of it. Those who changed their opinion were more engaged (e.g., considered the opposite of their current stance more fully) and were persuaded by evidence of safety benefits that result from effective speed reduction with ASE deployment.",
author = "Colleen Peterson and Douma, {Frank P} and Morris, {Nichole L}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3141/2660-09",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Transportation Research Record",
publisher = "National Research Council",
pages = "66--73",
booktitle = "Operator Education and Regulation; Safe Mobility for Older Persons; Traffic Enforcement; Occupant Protection; Alcohol and Drugs",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Addressing key concerns regarding automated speed enforcement via interactive survey

AU - Peterson, Colleen

AU - Douma, Frank P

AU - Morris, Nichole L

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Speeding is a public health crisis that accounts for approximately onethird of roadway deaths each year in the United States. One countermeasure with clearly documented efficacy to reduce speed is automated speed enforcement (ASE). Public acceptance, however, has been marginal, with many drivers calling into question its need and legality. This project aimed to measure public rejection of ASE and to provide individualized information strategically to determine if opinions may be shifted more favorably as a result. Statistically significant movement on ASE opinion was achieved after respondents engaged with a tailored survey that addressed their particular concerns about ASE. Almost half (47%) of those who began with a neutral or negative opinion of ASE moved toward a more favorable opinion of it. Those who changed their opinion were more engaged (e.g., considered the opposite of their current stance more fully) and were persuaded by evidence of safety benefits that result from effective speed reduction with ASE deployment.

AB - Speeding is a public health crisis that accounts for approximately onethird of roadway deaths each year in the United States. One countermeasure with clearly documented efficacy to reduce speed is automated speed enforcement (ASE). Public acceptance, however, has been marginal, with many drivers calling into question its need and legality. This project aimed to measure public rejection of ASE and to provide individualized information strategically to determine if opinions may be shifted more favorably as a result. Statistically significant movement on ASE opinion was achieved after respondents engaged with a tailored survey that addressed their particular concerns about ASE. Almost half (47%) of those who began with a neutral or negative opinion of ASE moved toward a more favorable opinion of it. Those who changed their opinion were more engaged (e.g., considered the opposite of their current stance more fully) and were persuaded by evidence of safety benefits that result from effective speed reduction with ASE deployment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033779646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033779646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3141/2660-09

DO - 10.3141/2660-09

M3 - Chapter

T3 - Transportation Research Record

SP - 66

EP - 73

BT - Operator Education and Regulation; Safe Mobility for Older Persons; Traffic Enforcement; Occupant Protection; Alcohol and Drugs

PB - National Research Council

ER -