Adaptation across multiple landscapes: Relatedness, complexity, and the long run effects of coordination in diversified firms

Mo Chen, Aseem Kaul, Brian Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Research Summary: We study the effect of coordination between businesses on the adaptation of diversified firms. Using a simulation-based approach, we show that coordination between businesses limits adaptation, causing the relative performance of diversified firms to decline relative to their focused counterparts over time, with this effect being strongest for moderate levels of relatedness between, and complexity within, businesses. Given complexity, firms diversifying into moderately related businesses may therefore be better off limiting coordination between businesses to a few key activities—if they diversify at all—sacrificing short run synergies for long run flexibility. Our study thus offers a novel argument for conglomerate diversification, while linking work on the costs of coordination in diversified firms to the literature on organizational adaptation. Managerial Summary: While coordination of activities between businesses enables a diversified firm to realize synergies, it may also limit the flexibility of each business to adapt to changing conditions over time. Thus, the very cross-business coordination that gives a diversified firm an advantage relative to its single business competitors in the short run may cause it to fall behind them in the long run. Using a mathematical simulation, we show that this negative effect is strongest for firms coordinating across moderately related businesses with activities that are highly interdependent. Multibusiness firms—especially moderately related diversifiers in complex businesses—may thus be better off coordinating only those activities that yield the greatest synergies, foregoing more marginal synergies in the short run for the sake of long run flexibility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1791-1821
Number of pages31
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume40
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge insight and feedback from Editor Connie Helfat and two anonymous reviewers in helping us improve our study. We are also grateful to Gautam Ahuja, Nick Argyres, Felipe Csaszar, J.P. Eggers, Samina Karim, Daniel Levinthal, Hart Posen, and Maggie Zhou, as well as to participants at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Dartmouth Junior Faculty Strategy Research Summer Camp, INFORMS Conference, Strategic Management Society Annual Conference, and the Workshop on Scale and Scope at Cass Business School, for their comments and suggestions on previous versions of this manuscript. Authors contributed equally and are listed in alphabetical order.

Keywords

  • NK model
  • adaptation
  • complexity
  • coordination costs
  • diversification
  • relatedness

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Adaptation across multiple landscapes: Relatedness, complexity, and the long run effects of coordination in diversified firms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this