Acoustic myography compared to electromyography during isometric fatigue and recovery

Arthur A. Rodriquez, James C. Agre, Eileen R. Knudtson, Cota, Todd M. Franke, Alexander V. Ng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared the acoustic (RMS‐AMG) to electromyographic (RMS‐EMG) signal, median frequency of EMG power spectrum (Fm), and quadriceps torque during isometric fatiguing contraction (FC) and recovery. Seven subjects were tested for strength (MVC) and then, on separate days, maintained 20%, 40%, or 80% MVC to exhaustion followed by MVC testing at regular intervals. Throughout FC, RMS‐EMG significantly (P < 0.05) increased and Fm significantly (P < 0.05) decreased during all trials; RMS‐AMG significantly (P < 0.05) increased only during the 20% and 40% trials. During recovery, MVC and RMS‐EMG recovered most slowly after the 20% trial and most rapidly after the 80% trial; Fm and RMS‐AMG recovered by 90 seconds after all trials. RMS‐AMG reflects RMS‐EMG during low but not high levels of FC. Recovery of strength is most depressed following FC at lower relative levels of torque. We conclude that RMS‐AMG behaves differently than RMS‐EMG, torque, and Fm during FC and recovery. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)188-192
Number of pages5
JournalMuscle & Nerve
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

Fingerprint

Myography
Torque
Electromyography
Acoustics
Fatigue
Isometric Contraction

Keywords

  • electromyography
  • fatigue
  • muscle sounds
  • quadriceps femoris

Cite this

Acoustic myography compared to electromyography during isometric fatigue and recovery. / Rodriquez, Arthur A.; Agre, James C.; Knudtson, Eileen R.; Cota; Franke, Todd M.; Ng, Alexander V.

In: Muscle & Nerve, Vol. 16, No. 2, 01.01.1993, p. 188-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rodriquez, Arthur A. ; Agre, James C. ; Knudtson, Eileen R. ; Cota ; Franke, Todd M. ; Ng, Alexander V. / Acoustic myography compared to electromyography during isometric fatigue and recovery. In: Muscle & Nerve. 1993 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 188-192.
@article{bc7abbffd4c3453c9a404cdf822483c3,
title = "Acoustic myography compared to electromyography during isometric fatigue and recovery",
abstract = "This study compared the acoustic (RMS‐AMG) to electromyographic (RMS‐EMG) signal, median frequency of EMG power spectrum (Fm), and quadriceps torque during isometric fatiguing contraction (FC) and recovery. Seven subjects were tested for strength (MVC) and then, on separate days, maintained 20{\%}, 40{\%}, or 80{\%} MVC to exhaustion followed by MVC testing at regular intervals. Throughout FC, RMS‐EMG significantly (P < 0.05) increased and Fm significantly (P < 0.05) decreased during all trials; RMS‐AMG significantly (P < 0.05) increased only during the 20{\%} and 40{\%} trials. During recovery, MVC and RMS‐EMG recovered most slowly after the 20{\%} trial and most rapidly after the 80{\%} trial; Fm and RMS‐AMG recovered by 90 seconds after all trials. RMS‐AMG reflects RMS‐EMG during low but not high levels of FC. Recovery of strength is most depressed following FC at lower relative levels of torque. We conclude that RMS‐AMG behaves differently than RMS‐EMG, torque, and Fm during FC and recovery. {\circledC} 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.",
keywords = "electromyography, fatigue, muscle sounds, quadriceps femoris",
author = "Rodriquez, {Arthur A.} and Agre, {James C.} and Knudtson, {Eileen R.} and Cota and Franke, {Todd M.} and Ng, {Alexander V.}",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mus.880160212",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "188--192",
journal = "Muscle and Nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acoustic myography compared to electromyography during isometric fatigue and recovery

AU - Rodriquez, Arthur A.

AU - Agre, James C.

AU - Knudtson, Eileen R.

AU - Cota,

AU - Franke, Todd M.

AU - Ng, Alexander V.

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - This study compared the acoustic (RMS‐AMG) to electromyographic (RMS‐EMG) signal, median frequency of EMG power spectrum (Fm), and quadriceps torque during isometric fatiguing contraction (FC) and recovery. Seven subjects were tested for strength (MVC) and then, on separate days, maintained 20%, 40%, or 80% MVC to exhaustion followed by MVC testing at regular intervals. Throughout FC, RMS‐EMG significantly (P < 0.05) increased and Fm significantly (P < 0.05) decreased during all trials; RMS‐AMG significantly (P < 0.05) increased only during the 20% and 40% trials. During recovery, MVC and RMS‐EMG recovered most slowly after the 20% trial and most rapidly after the 80% trial; Fm and RMS‐AMG recovered by 90 seconds after all trials. RMS‐AMG reflects RMS‐EMG during low but not high levels of FC. Recovery of strength is most depressed following FC at lower relative levels of torque. We conclude that RMS‐AMG behaves differently than RMS‐EMG, torque, and Fm during FC and recovery. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

AB - This study compared the acoustic (RMS‐AMG) to electromyographic (RMS‐EMG) signal, median frequency of EMG power spectrum (Fm), and quadriceps torque during isometric fatiguing contraction (FC) and recovery. Seven subjects were tested for strength (MVC) and then, on separate days, maintained 20%, 40%, or 80% MVC to exhaustion followed by MVC testing at regular intervals. Throughout FC, RMS‐EMG significantly (P < 0.05) increased and Fm significantly (P < 0.05) decreased during all trials; RMS‐AMG significantly (P < 0.05) increased only during the 20% and 40% trials. During recovery, MVC and RMS‐EMG recovered most slowly after the 20% trial and most rapidly after the 80% trial; Fm and RMS‐AMG recovered by 90 seconds after all trials. RMS‐AMG reflects RMS‐EMG during low but not high levels of FC. Recovery of strength is most depressed following FC at lower relative levels of torque. We conclude that RMS‐AMG behaves differently than RMS‐EMG, torque, and Fm during FC and recovery. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

KW - electromyography

KW - fatigue

KW - muscle sounds

KW - quadriceps femoris

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027472146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027472146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mus.880160212

DO - 10.1002/mus.880160212

M3 - Article

C2 - 8429844

AN - SCOPUS:0027472146

VL - 16

SP - 188

EP - 192

JO - Muscle and Nerve

JF - Muscle and Nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 2

ER -