Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Acoustic emission interpretation of ductile fracture processes

  • William W Gerberich
  • , M. Stout
  • , K. Jatavallabhula
  • , D. Atteridge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Detailed analyses of acoustic emission from several material classes have established that the predominant source in tensile testing is particle decohesion and fracture. Acoustic emission is a smoothly varying parameter with plastic strain in 4340 steel where small carbides predominate; however, in an IN 718 superalloy, it is both bimodal and exhibits a burst phenomena where very large carbides and nitrides as well as a medium size laves (δ) phase contribute. From microscopic and acoustic emission observations, it is found that the fracture process is sulfide decohesion followed by void sheet instability associated with carbides in 4340 steel. In IN 718, large carbide or nitride fractures are followed by void sheets associated with laves phase. Identification of the major particle nucleation sites have allowed an initial interpretation of ductile hole growth models. Application of McClintock hole growth and a Hahn and Rosenfield void sheet instability criterion to the ductile fracture process has provided a good correlation to tensile ductilities, plane-strain crack tip ductilities, and plane-strain fracture toughness, KIC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)491-514
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Journal of Fracture
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1979

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Acoustic emission interpretation of ductile fracture processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this