Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

“Achievement Gap” Language Affects Teachers’ Issue Prioritization

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The term “achievement gap” is regularly used to describe between-group differences in educational outcomes. However, critics of the term argue that it implies the problem is merely one of student performance and may depress support for policies aimed at structural solutions. We hypothesized that the phrase “racial achievement gap” would elicit lower levels of issue prioritization than the phrase “racial inequality in educational outcomes” due to the latter’s connotations of social justice. In a randomized survey experiment with a national teacher sample (N = 1,549), our hypothesis was confirmed. However, language did not affect teachers’ explanations for existing academic outcome disparities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)484-487
Number of pages4
JournalEducational Researcher
Volume48
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 AERA.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • achievement gap
  • disparities
  • educational policy
  • equity
  • experimental research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Achievement Gap” Language Affects Teachers’ Issue Prioritization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this