Abstract
The term “achievement gap” is regularly used to describe between-group differences in educational outcomes. However, critics of the term argue that it implies the problem is merely one of student performance and may depress support for policies aimed at structural solutions. We hypothesized that the phrase “racial achievement gap” would elicit lower levels of issue prioritization than the phrase “racial inequality in educational outcomes” due to the latter’s connotations of social justice. In a randomized survey experiment with a national teacher sample (N = 1,549), our hypothesis was confirmed. However, language did not affect teachers’ explanations for existing academic outcome disparities.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 484-487 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Educational Researcher |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 1 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 AERA.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- achievement gap
- disparities
- educational policy
- equity
- experimental research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '“Achievement Gap” Language Affects Teachers’ Issue Prioritization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS