Accelerometer test-retest reliability by data processing algorithms: Results from the Twin cities walking study

John R. Sirard, Ann Forsyth, J. Michael Oakes, Kathryn H. Schmitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine 1) the test-retest reliability of adult accelerometermeasured physical activity, and 2) how data processing decisions affect physical activity levels and test-retest reliability. Methods: 143 people wore the ActiGraph accelerometer for 2 7-day periods, 1 to 4 weeks apart. Five algorithms, varying nonwear criteria (20 vs. 60 min of 0 counts) and minimum wear requirements (6 vs. 10 hrs/day for ≥ 4 days) and a separate algorithm requiring ≥ 3 counts per min and ≥ 2 hours per day, were used to process the accelerometer data. Results: Processing the accelerometer data with different algorithms resulted in different levels of counts per day, sedentary, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Reliability correlations were very good to excellent (ICC = 0.70-0.90) for almost all algorithms and there were no significant differences between physical activity measures at Time 1 and Time 2. Conclusions: This paper presents the first assessment of test-retest reliability of the Actigraph over separate administrations in free-living subjects. The ActiGraph was highly reliable in measuring activity over a 7-day period in natural settings but data were sensitive to the algorithms used to process them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)668-674
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Physical Activity and Health
Volume8
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Walking

Keywords

  • Accelerometry
  • Data processing
  • Physical activity assessment
  • Reliability

Cite this

Accelerometer test-retest reliability by data processing algorithms : Results from the Twin cities walking study. / Sirard, John R.; Forsyth, Ann; Oakes, J. Michael; Schmitz, Kathryn H.

In: Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Vol. 8, No. 5, 07.2011, p. 668-674.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6ae99741de634dda89a97744824a53d6,
title = "Accelerometer test-retest reliability by data processing algorithms: Results from the Twin cities walking study",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to determine 1) the test-retest reliability of adult accelerometermeasured physical activity, and 2) how data processing decisions affect physical activity levels and test-retest reliability. Methods: 143 people wore the ActiGraph accelerometer for 2 7-day periods, 1 to 4 weeks apart. Five algorithms, varying nonwear criteria (20 vs. 60 min of 0 counts) and minimum wear requirements (6 vs. 10 hrs/day for ≥ 4 days) and a separate algorithm requiring ≥ 3 counts per min and ≥ 2 hours per day, were used to process the accelerometer data. Results: Processing the accelerometer data with different algorithms resulted in different levels of counts per day, sedentary, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Reliability correlations were very good to excellent (ICC = 0.70-0.90) for almost all algorithms and there were no significant differences between physical activity measures at Time 1 and Time 2. Conclusions: This paper presents the first assessment of test-retest reliability of the Actigraph over separate administrations in free-living subjects. The ActiGraph was highly reliable in measuring activity over a 7-day period in natural settings but data were sensitive to the algorithms used to process them.",
keywords = "Accelerometry, Data processing, Physical activity assessment, Reliability",
author = "Sirard, {John R.} and Ann Forsyth and Oakes, {J. Michael} and Schmitz, {Kathryn H.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1123/jpah.8.5.668",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "668--674",
journal = "Journal of Physical Activity and Health",
issn = "1543-3080",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accelerometer test-retest reliability by data processing algorithms

T2 - Results from the Twin cities walking study

AU - Sirard, John R.

AU - Forsyth, Ann

AU - Oakes, J. Michael

AU - Schmitz, Kathryn H.

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to determine 1) the test-retest reliability of adult accelerometermeasured physical activity, and 2) how data processing decisions affect physical activity levels and test-retest reliability. Methods: 143 people wore the ActiGraph accelerometer for 2 7-day periods, 1 to 4 weeks apart. Five algorithms, varying nonwear criteria (20 vs. 60 min of 0 counts) and minimum wear requirements (6 vs. 10 hrs/day for ≥ 4 days) and a separate algorithm requiring ≥ 3 counts per min and ≥ 2 hours per day, were used to process the accelerometer data. Results: Processing the accelerometer data with different algorithms resulted in different levels of counts per day, sedentary, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Reliability correlations were very good to excellent (ICC = 0.70-0.90) for almost all algorithms and there were no significant differences between physical activity measures at Time 1 and Time 2. Conclusions: This paper presents the first assessment of test-retest reliability of the Actigraph over separate administrations in free-living subjects. The ActiGraph was highly reliable in measuring activity over a 7-day period in natural settings but data were sensitive to the algorithms used to process them.

AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to determine 1) the test-retest reliability of adult accelerometermeasured physical activity, and 2) how data processing decisions affect physical activity levels and test-retest reliability. Methods: 143 people wore the ActiGraph accelerometer for 2 7-day periods, 1 to 4 weeks apart. Five algorithms, varying nonwear criteria (20 vs. 60 min of 0 counts) and minimum wear requirements (6 vs. 10 hrs/day for ≥ 4 days) and a separate algorithm requiring ≥ 3 counts per min and ≥ 2 hours per day, were used to process the accelerometer data. Results: Processing the accelerometer data with different algorithms resulted in different levels of counts per day, sedentary, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Reliability correlations were very good to excellent (ICC = 0.70-0.90) for almost all algorithms and there were no significant differences between physical activity measures at Time 1 and Time 2. Conclusions: This paper presents the first assessment of test-retest reliability of the Actigraph over separate administrations in free-living subjects. The ActiGraph was highly reliable in measuring activity over a 7-day period in natural settings but data were sensitive to the algorithms used to process them.

KW - Accelerometry

KW - Data processing

KW - Physical activity assessment

KW - Reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959538162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959538162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/jpah.8.5.668

DO - 10.1123/jpah.8.5.668

M3 - Article

C2 - 21734312

AN - SCOPUS:79959538162

VL - 8

SP - 668

EP - 674

JO - Journal of Physical Activity and Health

JF - Journal of Physical Activity and Health

SN - 1543-3080

IS - 5

ER -