Absolute and Relative Biases in Estimations of Personal Risk

Alexander J. Rothman, William M. Klein, Neil D. Weinstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

136 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two studies examined the accuracy of personal risk estimates, as determined by comparing mean estimates made by college students with population statistics for college-educated individuals. Study 1 suggested that optimistic biases (the tendency for people to think they are less at risk than the average person) arise more because people overestimating the average person's risk than because they underestimate their own risk. In Study 2, subjects rated their risk after being presented with risk statistics that were 150%, 100%, or 50% of the true values. Subjects' estimates decreased with decreases in the comparison statistics, as if subjects attempted to preserve their "below-average" status, but they changed less than did the statistics and were actually pessimistic in comparison to the 50% values. Implications for interventions designed to influence risk perceptions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1213-1236
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume26
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 16 1996

Fingerprint

Population Characteristics
Students

Cite this

Absolute and Relative Biases in Estimations of Personal Risk. / Rothman, Alexander J.; Klein, William M.; Weinstein, Neil D.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 14, 16.07.1996, p. 1213-1236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rothman, Alexander J. ; Klein, William M. ; Weinstein, Neil D. / Absolute and Relative Biases in Estimations of Personal Risk. In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1996 ; Vol. 26, No. 14. pp. 1213-1236.
@article{1388180a1aad46c79f08ee752b87b464,
title = "Absolute and Relative Biases in Estimations of Personal Risk",
abstract = "Two studies examined the accuracy of personal risk estimates, as determined by comparing mean estimates made by college students with population statistics for college-educated individuals. Study 1 suggested that optimistic biases (the tendency for people to think they are less at risk than the average person) arise more because people overestimating the average person's risk than because they underestimate their own risk. In Study 2, subjects rated their risk after being presented with risk statistics that were 150{\%}, 100{\%}, or 50{\%} of the true values. Subjects' estimates decreased with decreases in the comparison statistics, as if subjects attempted to preserve their {"}below-average{"} status, but they changed less than did the statistics and were actually pessimistic in comparison to the 50{\%} values. Implications for interventions designed to influence risk perceptions are discussed.",
author = "Rothman, {Alexander J.} and Klein, {William M.} and Weinstein, {Neil D.}",
year = "1996",
month = "7",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01778.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1213--1236",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absolute and Relative Biases in Estimations of Personal Risk

AU - Rothman, Alexander J.

AU - Klein, William M.

AU - Weinstein, Neil D.

PY - 1996/7/16

Y1 - 1996/7/16

N2 - Two studies examined the accuracy of personal risk estimates, as determined by comparing mean estimates made by college students with population statistics for college-educated individuals. Study 1 suggested that optimistic biases (the tendency for people to think they are less at risk than the average person) arise more because people overestimating the average person's risk than because they underestimate their own risk. In Study 2, subjects rated their risk after being presented with risk statistics that were 150%, 100%, or 50% of the true values. Subjects' estimates decreased with decreases in the comparison statistics, as if subjects attempted to preserve their "below-average" status, but they changed less than did the statistics and were actually pessimistic in comparison to the 50% values. Implications for interventions designed to influence risk perceptions are discussed.

AB - Two studies examined the accuracy of personal risk estimates, as determined by comparing mean estimates made by college students with population statistics for college-educated individuals. Study 1 suggested that optimistic biases (the tendency for people to think they are less at risk than the average person) arise more because people overestimating the average person's risk than because they underestimate their own risk. In Study 2, subjects rated their risk after being presented with risk statistics that were 150%, 100%, or 50% of the true values. Subjects' estimates decreased with decreases in the comparison statistics, as if subjects attempted to preserve their "below-average" status, but they changed less than did the statistics and were actually pessimistic in comparison to the 50% values. Implications for interventions designed to influence risk perceptions are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030487458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030487458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01778.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01778.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030487458

VL - 26

SP - 1213

EP - 1236

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 14

ER -