A Statewide Approach to Reducing Re-excision Rates for Women With Breast-conserving Surgery

  • Jessica R. Schumacher
  • , Elise H. Lawson
  • , Amanda L. Kong
  • , Joseph J. Weber
  • , Jeanette May
  • , Jeffrey Landercasper
  • , Bret Hanlon
  • , Nicholas Marka
  • , Manasa Venkatesh
  • , Randi S. Cartmill
  • , Sudha Pavuluri Quamme
  • , Connor Nikolay
  • , Caprice C. Greenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Test the effectiveness of benchmarked performance reports based on existing discharge data paired with a statewide intervention to implement evidence-based strategies on breast re-excision rates. Background: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a common breast cancer surgery performed in a range of hospital settings. Studies have demonstrated variations in post-BCS re-excision rates, identifying it as a high-value improvement target. Methods: Wisconsin Hospital Association discharge data (2017-2019) were used to compare 60-day re-excision rates following BCS for breast cancer. The analysis estimated the difference in the average change preintervention to postintervention between Surgical Collaborative of Wisconsin (SCW) and nonparticipating hospitals using a logistic mixed-effects model with repeated measures, adjusting for age, payer, and hospital volume, including hospitals as random effects. The intervention included 5 collaborative meetings in 2018 to 2019 where surgeon champions shared guideline updates, best practices/challenges, and facilitated action planning. Confidential benchmarked performance reports were provided. Results: In 2017, there were 3692 breast procedures in SCW and 1279 in nonparticipating hospitals; hospital-level re-excision rates ranged from 5% to >50%. There was no statistically significant baseline difference in re-excision rates between SCW and nonparticipating hospitals (16.1% vs. 17.1%, P=0.47). Re-excision significantly decreased for SCW but not for nonparticipating hospitals (odds ratio=0.69, 95% confidence interval=0.52-0.91). Conclusions: Benchmarked performance reports and collaborative quality improvement can decrease post-BCS re-excisions, increase quality, and decrease costs. Our study demonstrates the effective use of administrative data as a platform for statewide quality collaboratives. Using existing data requires fewer resources and offers a new paradigm that promotes participation across practice settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)665-672
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of surgery
Volume276
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This project was supported by funding from the Wisconsin Partnership Program (#4233), the National Cancer Institute (P30CA014520-45S5), and the University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Surgery.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • breast cancer surgery
  • breast-conserving treatment
  • collaborative
  • performance assessment
  • quality of care
  • re-excision

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Statewide Approach to Reducing Re-excision Rates for Women With Breast-conserving Surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this