TY - JOUR
T1 - A Schur complement formulation for solving free-boundary, Stefan problems of phase change
AU - Lun, Lisa
AU - Yeckel, Andrew
AU - Derby, Jeffrey J
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - A Schur complement formulation that utilizes a linear iterative solver is derived to solve a free-boundary, Stefan problem describing steady-state phase change via the Isotherm-Newton approach, which employs Newton's method to simultaneously and efficiently solve for both interface and field equations. This formulation is tested alongside more traditional solution strategies that employ direct or iterative linear solvers on the entire Jacobian matrix for a two-dimensional sample problem that discretizes the field equations using a Galerkin finite-element method and employs a deforming-grid approach to represent the melt-solid interface. All methods demonstrate quadratic convergence for sufficiently accurate Newton solves, but the two approaches utilizing linear iterative solvers show better scaling of computational effort with problem size. Of these two approaches, the Schur formulation proves to be more robust, converging with significantly smaller Krylov subspaces than those required to solve the global system of equations. Further improvement of performance are made through approximations and preconditioning of the Schur complement problem. Hence, the new Schur formulation shows promise as an affordable, robust, and scalable method to solve free-boundary, Stefan problems. Such models are employed to study a wide array of applications, including casting, welding, glass forming, planetary mantle and glacier dynamics, thermal energy storage, food processing, cryosurgery, metallurgical solidification, and crystal growth.
AB - A Schur complement formulation that utilizes a linear iterative solver is derived to solve a free-boundary, Stefan problem describing steady-state phase change via the Isotherm-Newton approach, which employs Newton's method to simultaneously and efficiently solve for both interface and field equations. This formulation is tested alongside more traditional solution strategies that employ direct or iterative linear solvers on the entire Jacobian matrix for a two-dimensional sample problem that discretizes the field equations using a Galerkin finite-element method and employs a deforming-grid approach to represent the melt-solid interface. All methods demonstrate quadratic convergence for sufficiently accurate Newton solves, but the two approaches utilizing linear iterative solvers show better scaling of computational effort with problem size. Of these two approaches, the Schur formulation proves to be more robust, converging with significantly smaller Krylov subspaces than those required to solve the global system of equations. Further improvement of performance are made through approximations and preconditioning of the Schur complement problem. Hence, the new Schur formulation shows promise as an affordable, robust, and scalable method to solve free-boundary, Stefan problems. Such models are employed to study a wide array of applications, including casting, welding, glass forming, planetary mantle and glacier dynamics, thermal energy storage, food processing, cryosurgery, metallurgical solidification, and crystal growth.
KW - Crystal growth
KW - Free-boundary
KW - GMRES
KW - Schur complement
KW - Solidification
KW - Stefan problem
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955514849&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955514849&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.06.046
DO - 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.06.046
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77955514849
SN - 0021-9991
VL - 229
SP - 7942
EP - 7955
JO - Journal of Computational Physics
JF - Journal of Computational Physics
IS - 20
ER -