TY - JOUR
T1 - A review of the scientific rigor, reproducibility, and transparency studies conducted by the ABRF research groups
AU - Mische, Sheenah M.
AU - Fisher, Nancy C.
AU - Meyn, Susan M.
AU - Church, Katia Sol
AU - Hegstad-Davies, Rebecca L.
AU - Weis-Garcia, Frances
AU - Adams, Marie
AU - Ashton, John M.
AU - Delventhal, Kym M.
AU - Dragon, Julie A.
AU - Holmes, Laura
AU - Jagtap, Pratik
AU - Kubow, Kristopher E.
AU - Mason, Christopher E.
AU - Palmblad, Magnus
AU - Searle, Brian C.
AU - Turck, Christoph W.
AU - Knudtson, Kevin L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 ABRF.
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - Shared research resource facilities, also known as core laboratories (Cores), are responsible for generating a significant and growing portion of the research data in academic biomedical research institutions. Cores represent a central repository for institutional knowledge management, with deep expertise in the strengths and limitations of technology and its applications. They inherently support transparency and scientific reproduc-ibility by protecting against cognitive bias in research design and data analysis, and they have institutional responsibility for the conduct of research (research ethics, regulatory compliance, and financial accountability) performed in their Cores. The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) is a FASEB-member scientific society whose members are scientists and administrators that manage or support Cores. The ABRF Research Groups (RGs), representing expertise for an array of cutting-edge and established technology platforms, perform multicenter research studies to determine and communicate best practices and community-based standards. This review provides a summary of the contributions of the ABRF RGs to promote scientific rigor and reproducibility in Cores from the published literature, ABRF meetings, and ABRF RGs communications.
AB - Shared research resource facilities, also known as core laboratories (Cores), are responsible for generating a significant and growing portion of the research data in academic biomedical research institutions. Cores represent a central repository for institutional knowledge management, with deep expertise in the strengths and limitations of technology and its applications. They inherently support transparency and scientific reproduc-ibility by protecting against cognitive bias in research design and data analysis, and they have institutional responsibility for the conduct of research (research ethics, regulatory compliance, and financial accountability) performed in their Cores. The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) is a FASEB-member scientific society whose members are scientists and administrators that manage or support Cores. The ABRF Research Groups (RGs), representing expertise for an array of cutting-edge and established technology platforms, perform multicenter research studies to determine and communicate best practices and community-based standards. This review provides a summary of the contributions of the ABRF RGs to promote scientific rigor and reproducibility in Cores from the published literature, ABRF meetings, and ABRF RGs communications.
KW - Collaborative research
KW - Community based standards
KW - Core laboratories
KW - Multicenter research studies
KW - Shared resource
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084167859&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084167859&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7171/jbt.20-3101-003
DO - 10.7171/jbt.20-3101-003
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31969795
AN - SCOPUS:85084167859
SN - 1524-0215
VL - 31
SP - 11
EP - 26
JO - Journal of Biomolecular Techniques
JF - Journal of Biomolecular Techniques
IS - 1
ER -