A Review of Options for Mitigating Take of Golden Eagles at Wind Energy Facilities.

Taber D. Allison, Jean Fitts Cochrane, Eric Lonsdorf, Carol Sanders-Reed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Wind energy development has expanded rapidly in the past decade, becoming a significant source of electricity, and a major element in a global strategy to reduce carbon emissions and the effects of climate change. Golden Eagles ( Aquila chrysaetos) can collide with wind turbines, adding to the existing and substantial mortality from other anthropogenic sources. These collisions are a conservation concern, and they pose a legal risk to wind energy companies and potentially hamper development in areas where the range of Golden Eagle overlaps areas of high wind energy potential. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, through the revised Eagle Rule and the Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance, has designed a mitigation strategy for eagle conservation that allows wind energy companies to obtain incidental take permits. However, the strategy is challenged by a lack of data supporting scientifically rigorous strategies to mitigate eagle take, where mitigation is defined as efforts to avoid and minimize take, and compensate for unavoidable take. We review the steps and options a wind developer can consider to mitigate predicted eagle collisions with wind turbines consistent with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's revised Eagle Rule and Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance. Most of these options have limited or no scientific support and their effect on reducing risk of eagle collisions is unknown. We briefly describe approaches for evaluating technology intended to minimize eagle take and for developing options to offset unavoidable eagle take that are quantifiable and verifiable. Because estimates of Golden Eagle fatalities at many wind energy projects are low, research to evaluate mitigation measures needs to be coordinated and collaborative across multiple wind energy facilities to improve our ability to produce scientifically robust mitigation strategies. The impetus for these efforts is improving implementation and compliance with the revised Eagle Rule, but the results have benefits beyond Golden Eagles, for raptors and their ecological communities.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)319-333
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Raptor Research
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

wind power
eagles
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Aquila chrysaetos
electricity

Keywords

  • GOLDEN eagle
  • WIND power
  • ELECTRICITY
  • CARBON & the environment
  • CLIMATE change
  • Aquila chrysaetos
  • Golden Eagle
  • mitigation
  • mortality
  • take
  • wind energy

Cite this

A Review of Options for Mitigating Take of Golden Eagles at Wind Energy Facilities. / Allison, Taber D.; Cochrane, Jean Fitts; Lonsdorf, Eric; Sanders-Reed, Carol.

In: Journal of Raptor Research, Vol. 51, No. 3, 01.09.2017, p. 319-333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Allison, Taber D. ; Cochrane, Jean Fitts ; Lonsdorf, Eric ; Sanders-Reed, Carol. / A Review of Options for Mitigating Take of Golden Eagles at Wind Energy Facilities. In: Journal of Raptor Research. 2017 ; Vol. 51, No. 3. pp. 319-333.
@article{6ef7335a640b4b9b87ce964165eb1c71,
title = "A Review of Options for Mitigating Take of Golden Eagles at Wind Energy Facilities.",
abstract = "Wind energy development has expanded rapidly in the past decade, becoming a significant source of electricity, and a major element in a global strategy to reduce carbon emissions and the effects of climate change. Golden Eagles ( Aquila chrysaetos) can collide with wind turbines, adding to the existing and substantial mortality from other anthropogenic sources. These collisions are a conservation concern, and they pose a legal risk to wind energy companies and potentially hamper development in areas where the range of Golden Eagle overlaps areas of high wind energy potential. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, through the revised Eagle Rule and the Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance, has designed a mitigation strategy for eagle conservation that allows wind energy companies to obtain incidental take permits. However, the strategy is challenged by a lack of data supporting scientifically rigorous strategies to mitigate eagle take, where mitigation is defined as efforts to avoid and minimize take, and compensate for unavoidable take. We review the steps and options a wind developer can consider to mitigate predicted eagle collisions with wind turbines consistent with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's revised Eagle Rule and Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance. Most of these options have limited or no scientific support and their effect on reducing risk of eagle collisions is unknown. We briefly describe approaches for evaluating technology intended to minimize eagle take and for developing options to offset unavoidable eagle take that are quantifiable and verifiable. Because estimates of Golden Eagle fatalities at many wind energy projects are low, research to evaluate mitigation measures needs to be coordinated and collaborative across multiple wind energy facilities to improve our ability to produce scientifically robust mitigation strategies. The impetus for these efforts is improving implementation and compliance with the revised Eagle Rule, but the results have benefits beyond Golden Eagles, for raptors and their ecological communities.",
keywords = "GOLDEN eagle, WIND power, ELECTRICITY, CARBON & the environment, CLIMATE change, Aquila chrysaetos, Golden Eagle, mitigation, mortality, take, wind energy",
author = "Allison, {Taber D.} and Cochrane, {Jean Fitts} and Eric Lonsdorf and Carol Sanders-Reed",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3356/JRR-16-76.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "319--333",
journal = "Journal of Raptor Research",
issn = "0892-1016",
publisher = "Raptor Research Foundation, Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Review of Options for Mitigating Take of Golden Eagles at Wind Energy Facilities.

AU - Allison, Taber D.

AU - Cochrane, Jean Fitts

AU - Lonsdorf, Eric

AU - Sanders-Reed, Carol

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Wind energy development has expanded rapidly in the past decade, becoming a significant source of electricity, and a major element in a global strategy to reduce carbon emissions and the effects of climate change. Golden Eagles ( Aquila chrysaetos) can collide with wind turbines, adding to the existing and substantial mortality from other anthropogenic sources. These collisions are a conservation concern, and they pose a legal risk to wind energy companies and potentially hamper development in areas where the range of Golden Eagle overlaps areas of high wind energy potential. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, through the revised Eagle Rule and the Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance, has designed a mitigation strategy for eagle conservation that allows wind energy companies to obtain incidental take permits. However, the strategy is challenged by a lack of data supporting scientifically rigorous strategies to mitigate eagle take, where mitigation is defined as efforts to avoid and minimize take, and compensate for unavoidable take. We review the steps and options a wind developer can consider to mitigate predicted eagle collisions with wind turbines consistent with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's revised Eagle Rule and Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance. Most of these options have limited or no scientific support and their effect on reducing risk of eagle collisions is unknown. We briefly describe approaches for evaluating technology intended to minimize eagle take and for developing options to offset unavoidable eagle take that are quantifiable and verifiable. Because estimates of Golden Eagle fatalities at many wind energy projects are low, research to evaluate mitigation measures needs to be coordinated and collaborative across multiple wind energy facilities to improve our ability to produce scientifically robust mitigation strategies. The impetus for these efforts is improving implementation and compliance with the revised Eagle Rule, but the results have benefits beyond Golden Eagles, for raptors and their ecological communities.

AB - Wind energy development has expanded rapidly in the past decade, becoming a significant source of electricity, and a major element in a global strategy to reduce carbon emissions and the effects of climate change. Golden Eagles ( Aquila chrysaetos) can collide with wind turbines, adding to the existing and substantial mortality from other anthropogenic sources. These collisions are a conservation concern, and they pose a legal risk to wind energy companies and potentially hamper development in areas where the range of Golden Eagle overlaps areas of high wind energy potential. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, through the revised Eagle Rule and the Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance, has designed a mitigation strategy for eagle conservation that allows wind energy companies to obtain incidental take permits. However, the strategy is challenged by a lack of data supporting scientifically rigorous strategies to mitigate eagle take, where mitigation is defined as efforts to avoid and minimize take, and compensate for unavoidable take. We review the steps and options a wind developer can consider to mitigate predicted eagle collisions with wind turbines consistent with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's revised Eagle Rule and Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance. Most of these options have limited or no scientific support and their effect on reducing risk of eagle collisions is unknown. We briefly describe approaches for evaluating technology intended to minimize eagle take and for developing options to offset unavoidable eagle take that are quantifiable and verifiable. Because estimates of Golden Eagle fatalities at many wind energy projects are low, research to evaluate mitigation measures needs to be coordinated and collaborative across multiple wind energy facilities to improve our ability to produce scientifically robust mitigation strategies. The impetus for these efforts is improving implementation and compliance with the revised Eagle Rule, but the results have benefits beyond Golden Eagles, for raptors and their ecological communities.

KW - GOLDEN eagle

KW - WIND power

KW - ELECTRICITY

KW - CARBON & the environment

KW - CLIMATE change

KW - Aquila chrysaetos

KW - Golden Eagle

KW - mitigation

KW - mortality

KW - take

KW - wind energy

U2 - 10.3356/JRR-16-76.1

DO - 10.3356/JRR-16-76.1

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 319

EP - 333

JO - Journal of Raptor Research

JF - Journal of Raptor Research

SN - 0892-1016

IS - 3

ER -