A randomized clinical trial of burst vs. spaced physical therapy for Parkinsons disease

Introduction: The optimal timing for physical therapy (PT) delivery in Parkinson's disease (PD) is unknown. Our objective was to determine whether spacing physical therapy visits over a longer period of time is beneficial for maintenance of physical function in PD. Methods: A single center, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial of PD participants. Participants (n = 30) were randomized to either burst (two PT sessions weekly for 6 weeks) or spaced (one PT session every 2 weeks for 6 months) PT. 11 participants in each arm completed the study and were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test at baseline and 6 months. The burst group had an additional outcome measure timepoint at the completion of PT at 6 weeks. Results: Neither group achieved a minimal clinically significant benefit in the TUG score (3.5s) at 6 months. The spaced PT TUG scores were maintained when comparing baseline (7.8 ± 1.5s) and 6 month timepoints (7.8 ± 2.6s, p = 0.594). The burst group TUG scores comparing baseline (9.8 ± 3.8s) to 6 weeks (9.1 ± 3.0s) also was maintained (p = 0.365). The burst group worsened, however, when measuring the period from 6 weeks to 6 months (12.1 ± 7.6s, p = 0.034). Conclusions: The spaced PT group had stability of the TUG mobility measure at 6 months, while the burst group had a significant worsening once PT was discontinued after 6 weeks. It is feasible to test these approaches in a future larger comparative effectiveness study.