TY - JOUR
T1 - A quality improvement project addressing the underreporting of delirium in hip fracture patients
AU - Onizuka, Naoko
AU - Huyke-Hernández, Fernando A.
AU - Roby, Myriam A.
AU - Martell, Tom F.
AU - Scislow, Rachael M.
AU - Jones, Sarah C.
AU - Olson, Andrew
AU - James, Nicole
AU - Switzer, Julie A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge the orthopaedic nursing team and additional staff at Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital for their participation in process interviews.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Introduction: After discovering a low incidence of delirium for hip fracture patients at our institution, we evaluated if this was due to underreporting and, if so, where process errors occurred. Methods: Hip fracture patients aged ≥60 with a diagnosis of delirium were identified. Chart-Based Delirium Identification Instrument (CHART-DEL) identified missed diagnoses of delirium. Process maps were created based off staff interviews and observations. Results: The incidence of delirium was 15.3% (N = 176). Within a random sample (n = 98), 15 patients (15.5%) were diagnosed, while 20 (24.7%) went undiagnosed despite evidence of delirium. Including missed diagnoses, delirium prevalence was higher in the sample compared to all patients (35.7% vs 15.3%, p < 0.001). Most missed diagnoses were due to failure in identifying delirium (60%) or failure in documenting/coding diagnosis (20%). The prevalence of baseline cognitive impairment was higher in undiagnosed delirium patients versus correctly diagnosed patients (80% vs 20%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Our institution significantly underreports delirium among hip fracture patients mainly due to; (1) failure to identify delirium by the clinical staff, and (2) failure to document/code diagnosis despite correct identification. Baseline cognitive impairment can render delirium diagnosis challenging. These serve as targets for quality improvement and hip fracture care enhancement.
AB - Introduction: After discovering a low incidence of delirium for hip fracture patients at our institution, we evaluated if this was due to underreporting and, if so, where process errors occurred. Methods: Hip fracture patients aged ≥60 with a diagnosis of delirium were identified. Chart-Based Delirium Identification Instrument (CHART-DEL) identified missed diagnoses of delirium. Process maps were created based off staff interviews and observations. Results: The incidence of delirium was 15.3% (N = 176). Within a random sample (n = 98), 15 patients (15.5%) were diagnosed, while 20 (24.7%) went undiagnosed despite evidence of delirium. Including missed diagnoses, delirium prevalence was higher in the sample compared to all patients (35.7% vs 15.3%, p < 0.001). Most missed diagnoses were due to failure in identifying delirium (60%) or failure in documenting/coding diagnosis (20%). The prevalence of baseline cognitive impairment was higher in undiagnosed delirium patients versus correctly diagnosed patients (80% vs 20%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Our institution significantly underreports delirium among hip fracture patients mainly due to; (1) failure to identify delirium by the clinical staff, and (2) failure to document/code diagnosis despite correct identification. Baseline cognitive impairment can render delirium diagnosis challenging. These serve as targets for quality improvement and hip fracture care enhancement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141986792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85141986792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijotn.2022.100974
DO - 10.1016/j.ijotn.2022.100974
M3 - Article
C2 - 36399973
SN - 1878-1241
VL - 47
SP - 100974
JO - International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing
JF - International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing
M1 - 100974
ER -