Abstract
The term public has perhaps the oldest theoretical tradition of any concept used in the public relations literature, yet it is also perhaps the most misunderstood. Given the widespread misuse of the term public, this chapter has three aims. First, the chapter provides a brief review of the theoretical heritage behind the concepts of the public and publics (plural). Second, it describes two general ontological orientations by which public relations scholars have conceptualized publics. Finally, the discussion challenges the organization-public relationships (OPR) literature by stating that OPR scholarship has inappropriately operationalized and measured publics in countless studies, meaning the implications of these studies for developing publics theory should be called into question.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Public Relations Theory III |
| Subtitle of host publication | In the Age of Publics |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| Pages | 23-37 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781000830835 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780367693282 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 selection and editorial matter, Carl H. Botan and Erich J. Sommerfeldt; individual chapters, the contributors.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A "Public" by Any Other Name: Reclaiming Publics Theory, and Liberating Publics From "OPR"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS