A protocol for developing reporting guidelines for laboratory studies in Endodontology

V. Nagendrababu, P. E. Murray, Ronald Ordinola Zapata, O. A. Peters, I. N. Rôças, J. F. Siqueira, E. Priya, J. Jayaraman, S. J. Pulikkotil, P. M.H. Dummer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Laboratory-based research studies are the most common form of research endeavour and make up the majority of manuscripts that are submitted for publication in the field of Endodontology. The scientific information derived from laboratory studies can be used to design a wide range of subsequent studies and clinical trials and may have translational potential to benefit clinical practice. Unfortunately, the majority of laboratory-based articles submitted for publication fail the peer-review step, because unacceptable flaws or substantial limitations are identified. Even when apparently well-conducted laboratory-based articles are peer-reviewed, they can often require substantial corrections prior to the publication. It is apparent that some authors and reviewers may lack the training and experience to have developed a systematic approach to evaluate the quality of laboratory studies. Occasionally, even accepted manuscripts contain limitations that may compromise interpretation of data. To help authors avoid manuscript rejection and correction pitfalls, and to aid editors/reviewers to evaluate manuscripts systematically, the purpose of this project is to establish and publish quality guidelines for authors to report laboratory studies in the field of Endodontology so that the highest standards are achieved. The new guidelines will be named–‘Preferred Reporting Items for Laboratory studies in Endodontology’ (PRILE). A steering committee was assembled by the project leads to develop the guidelines through a five-phase consensus process. The committee will identify new items as well as review and adapt items from existing guidelines. The items forming the draft guidelines will be reviewed and refined by a PRILE Delphi Group (PDG). The items will be evaluated by the PDG on a nine-point Likert scale for relevance and inclusion. The agreed items will then be discussed by a PRILE face-to-face consensus meeting group (PFCMG) formed by 20 individuals to further refine the guidelines. This will be subject to final approval by the steering committee. The approved PRILE guidelines will be disseminated through publication in relevant journals, presented at congresses/meetings, and be freely available on a dedicated website. Feedback and comments will be solicited from researchers, editors and peer reviewers, who are invited to contact the steering committee with comments to help them update the guidelines periodically.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1090-1095
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Endodontic Journal
Volume52
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

Fingerprint

Endodontics
Guidelines
Manuscripts
Publications
Consensus
Peer Review
Group Processes
Research
Research Personnel
Clinical Trials

Keywords

  • endodontics
  • endodontology
  • laboratory studies
  • quality
  • reporting guidelines

Cite this

Nagendrababu, V., Murray, P. E., Ordinola Zapata, R., Peters, O. A., Rôças, I. N., Siqueira, J. F., ... Dummer, P. M. H. (2019). A protocol for developing reporting guidelines for laboratory studies in Endodontology. International Endodontic Journal, 52(8), 1090-1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13123

A protocol for developing reporting guidelines for laboratory studies in Endodontology. / Nagendrababu, V.; Murray, P. E.; Ordinola Zapata, Ronald; Peters, O. A.; Rôças, I. N.; Siqueira, J. F.; Priya, E.; Jayaraman, J.; Pulikkotil, S. J.; Dummer, P. M.H.

In: International Endodontic Journal, Vol. 52, No. 8, 01.08.2019, p. 1090-1095.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Nagendrababu, V, Murray, PE, Ordinola Zapata, R, Peters, OA, Rôças, IN, Siqueira, JF, Priya, E, Jayaraman, J, Pulikkotil, SJ & Dummer, PMH 2019, 'A protocol for developing reporting guidelines for laboratory studies in Endodontology', International Endodontic Journal, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 1090-1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13123
Nagendrababu, V. ; Murray, P. E. ; Ordinola Zapata, Ronald ; Peters, O. A. ; Rôças, I. N. ; Siqueira, J. F. ; Priya, E. ; Jayaraman, J. ; Pulikkotil, S. J. ; Dummer, P. M.H. / A protocol for developing reporting guidelines for laboratory studies in Endodontology. In: International Endodontic Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 52, No. 8. pp. 1090-1095.
@article{df5a7ace240f4670802fd8256cabe71f,
title = "A protocol for developing reporting guidelines for laboratory studies in Endodontology",
abstract = "Laboratory-based research studies are the most common form of research endeavour and make up the majority of manuscripts that are submitted for publication in the field of Endodontology. The scientific information derived from laboratory studies can be used to design a wide range of subsequent studies and clinical trials and may have translational potential to benefit clinical practice. Unfortunately, the majority of laboratory-based articles submitted for publication fail the peer-review step, because unacceptable flaws or substantial limitations are identified. Even when apparently well-conducted laboratory-based articles are peer-reviewed, they can often require substantial corrections prior to the publication. It is apparent that some authors and reviewers may lack the training and experience to have developed a systematic approach to evaluate the quality of laboratory studies. Occasionally, even accepted manuscripts contain limitations that may compromise interpretation of data. To help authors avoid manuscript rejection and correction pitfalls, and to aid editors/reviewers to evaluate manuscripts systematically, the purpose of this project is to establish and publish quality guidelines for authors to report laboratory studies in the field of Endodontology so that the highest standards are achieved. The new guidelines will be named–‘Preferred Reporting Items for Laboratory studies in Endodontology’ (PRILE). A steering committee was assembled by the project leads to develop the guidelines through a five-phase consensus process. The committee will identify new items as well as review and adapt items from existing guidelines. The items forming the draft guidelines will be reviewed and refined by a PRILE Delphi Group (PDG). The items will be evaluated by the PDG on a nine-point Likert scale for relevance and inclusion. The agreed items will then be discussed by a PRILE face-to-face consensus meeting group (PFCMG) formed by 20 individuals to further refine the guidelines. This will be subject to final approval by the steering committee. The approved PRILE guidelines will be disseminated through publication in relevant journals, presented at congresses/meetings, and be freely available on a dedicated website. Feedback and comments will be solicited from researchers, editors and peer reviewers, who are invited to contact the steering committee with comments to help them update the guidelines periodically.",
keywords = "endodontics, endodontology, laboratory studies, quality, reporting guidelines",
author = "V. Nagendrababu and Murray, {P. E.} and {Ordinola Zapata}, Ronald and Peters, {O. A.} and R{\^o}{\cc}as, {I. N.} and Siqueira, {J. F.} and E. Priya and J. Jayaraman and Pulikkotil, {S. J.} and Dummer, {P. M.H.}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/iej.13123",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "1090--1095",
journal = "International Endodontic Journal",
issn = "0143-2885",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A protocol for developing reporting guidelines for laboratory studies in Endodontology

AU - Nagendrababu, V.

AU - Murray, P. E.

AU - Ordinola Zapata, Ronald

AU - Peters, O. A.

AU - Rôças, I. N.

AU - Siqueira, J. F.

AU - Priya, E.

AU - Jayaraman, J.

AU - Pulikkotil, S. J.

AU - Dummer, P. M.H.

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Laboratory-based research studies are the most common form of research endeavour and make up the majority of manuscripts that are submitted for publication in the field of Endodontology. The scientific information derived from laboratory studies can be used to design a wide range of subsequent studies and clinical trials and may have translational potential to benefit clinical practice. Unfortunately, the majority of laboratory-based articles submitted for publication fail the peer-review step, because unacceptable flaws or substantial limitations are identified. Even when apparently well-conducted laboratory-based articles are peer-reviewed, they can often require substantial corrections prior to the publication. It is apparent that some authors and reviewers may lack the training and experience to have developed a systematic approach to evaluate the quality of laboratory studies. Occasionally, even accepted manuscripts contain limitations that may compromise interpretation of data. To help authors avoid manuscript rejection and correction pitfalls, and to aid editors/reviewers to evaluate manuscripts systematically, the purpose of this project is to establish and publish quality guidelines for authors to report laboratory studies in the field of Endodontology so that the highest standards are achieved. The new guidelines will be named–‘Preferred Reporting Items for Laboratory studies in Endodontology’ (PRILE). A steering committee was assembled by the project leads to develop the guidelines through a five-phase consensus process. The committee will identify new items as well as review and adapt items from existing guidelines. The items forming the draft guidelines will be reviewed and refined by a PRILE Delphi Group (PDG). The items will be evaluated by the PDG on a nine-point Likert scale for relevance and inclusion. The agreed items will then be discussed by a PRILE face-to-face consensus meeting group (PFCMG) formed by 20 individuals to further refine the guidelines. This will be subject to final approval by the steering committee. The approved PRILE guidelines will be disseminated through publication in relevant journals, presented at congresses/meetings, and be freely available on a dedicated website. Feedback and comments will be solicited from researchers, editors and peer reviewers, who are invited to contact the steering committee with comments to help them update the guidelines periodically.

AB - Laboratory-based research studies are the most common form of research endeavour and make up the majority of manuscripts that are submitted for publication in the field of Endodontology. The scientific information derived from laboratory studies can be used to design a wide range of subsequent studies and clinical trials and may have translational potential to benefit clinical practice. Unfortunately, the majority of laboratory-based articles submitted for publication fail the peer-review step, because unacceptable flaws or substantial limitations are identified. Even when apparently well-conducted laboratory-based articles are peer-reviewed, they can often require substantial corrections prior to the publication. It is apparent that some authors and reviewers may lack the training and experience to have developed a systematic approach to evaluate the quality of laboratory studies. Occasionally, even accepted manuscripts contain limitations that may compromise interpretation of data. To help authors avoid manuscript rejection and correction pitfalls, and to aid editors/reviewers to evaluate manuscripts systematically, the purpose of this project is to establish and publish quality guidelines for authors to report laboratory studies in the field of Endodontology so that the highest standards are achieved. The new guidelines will be named–‘Preferred Reporting Items for Laboratory studies in Endodontology’ (PRILE). A steering committee was assembled by the project leads to develop the guidelines through a five-phase consensus process. The committee will identify new items as well as review and adapt items from existing guidelines. The items forming the draft guidelines will be reviewed and refined by a PRILE Delphi Group (PDG). The items will be evaluated by the PDG on a nine-point Likert scale for relevance and inclusion. The agreed items will then be discussed by a PRILE face-to-face consensus meeting group (PFCMG) formed by 20 individuals to further refine the guidelines. This will be subject to final approval by the steering committee. The approved PRILE guidelines will be disseminated through publication in relevant journals, presented at congresses/meetings, and be freely available on a dedicated website. Feedback and comments will be solicited from researchers, editors and peer reviewers, who are invited to contact the steering committee with comments to help them update the guidelines periodically.

KW - endodontics

KW - endodontology

KW - laboratory studies

KW - quality

KW - reporting guidelines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064940938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064940938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/iej.13123

DO - 10.1111/iej.13123

M3 - Review article

VL - 52

SP - 1090

EP - 1095

JO - International Endodontic Journal

JF - International Endodontic Journal

SN - 0143-2885

IS - 8

ER -