Abstract
Background & Aims: Digital image analysis (DIA) allows quantification of nuclear DNA content and may help distinguish benign and malignant strictures of the biliary tract. Methods: One hundred ten consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for suspicious biliary tract strictures were enrolled in a prospective study comparing the accuracy of DIA and routine cytology (RC). Standard brush cytology sampling was performed twice by using 2 cytology brushes per patient. Both brushes were fixed in a single-specimen vial. Each specimen was formed into 1 pellet, and the sample was equally divided for evaluation by DIA and RC. DNA histograms were generated for ploidy analysis. The DIA criterion for malignancy was demonstration of aneuploidy. Results: Two patients had inadequate samples obtained for DIA analysis, 7 benign patients were excluded because of inadequate follow-up of less than 75 days, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up to clarify malignant versus benign disease. Of the remaining 100 patients, 56 strictures were malignant and 44 were benign. The sensitivities of DIA and RC were 39.3% and 17.9%, respectively (P = 0.014). The specificities of DIA and RC were 77.3% and 97.7%, respectively (P = 0.003). The accuracy of DIA (56.0%) was equivalent to RC (53.0%). Conclusions: DIA is a valuable adjunct to RC for detecting malignant strictures of the biliary tract.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 214-219 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
Volume | 2 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2004 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright:Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords
- DIA
- Digital image analysis
- ERCP
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
- PDI
- Peak DNA indice
- RC
- Routine cytology