A preliminary evaluation of fast forword-language as an adjuvant treatment in language intervention

Marc E. Fey, Lizbeth H. Finestack, Byron J. Gajewski, Mihai Popescu, Jeffrey D. Lewine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations


Purpose: Fast ForWord-Language (FFW-L) is designed to enhance children's processing of auditory-verbal signals and, thus, their ability to learn language. As a preliminary evaluation of this claim, we examined the effects of a 5-week course of FFW-L as an adjuvant treatment with a subsequent 5-week conventional narrative-based language intervention (NBLI) that targeted narrative comprehension and production and grammatical output. Method: Twenty-three children 6-8 years of age with language impairments were assigned randomly to 1 of 3 intervention sequences: (a) FFW-L/NBLI, (b) NBLI/FFW-L, or (c) wait/NBLI. We predicted that after both treatment periods, the FFW-L/NBLI group would show greater gains on measures of narrative ability, conversational grammar, and nonword repetition than the other groups. Results: After the first 5-week study period, the intervention groups, taken together (i.e., FFW-L/NBLI and NBLI/FFW-L), significantly outperformed the no-treatment wait/NBLI group on 2 narrative measures. At the final test period, all 3 groups displayed significant time-related effects on measures of narrative ability, but there were no statistically significant between-groups effects of intervention sequence. Conclusions: This preliminary study provides no evidence to support the claim that FFW-L enhances children's response to a conventional language intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)430-449
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1 2010


  • Child language disorders
  • Fast ForWord
  • Language intervention
  • Narratives


Dive into the research topics of 'A preliminary evaluation of fast forword-language as an adjuvant treatment in language intervention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this