A pragmatic, stepped-wedge, hybrid type II trial of interoperable clinical decision support to improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for patients with traumatic brain injury

Christopher J. Tignanelli, Surbhi Shah, David M Vock, Lianne Siegel, Carlos Serrano, Elliott Haut, Sean Switzer, Christie L. Martin, Rubina Rizvi, Vincent Peta, Peter C. Jenkins, Nicholas Lemke, Thankam Thyvalikakath, Jerome A. Osheroff, Denise Torres, David Vawdrey, Rachael A. Callcut, Mary Butler, Genevieve B. Melton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable medical condition which has substantial impact on patient morbidity, mortality, and disability. Unfortunately, adherence to the published best practices for VTE prevention, based on patient centered outcomes research (PCOR), is highly variable across U.S. hospitals, which represents a gap between current evidence and clinical practice leading to adverse patient outcomes. This gap is especially large in the case of traumatic brain injury (TBI), where reluctance to initiate VTE prevention due to concerns for potentially increasing the rates of intracranial bleeding drives poor rates of VTE prophylaxis. This is despite research which has shown early initiation of VTE prophylaxis to be safe in TBI without increased risk of delayed neurosurgical intervention or death. Clinical decision support (CDS) is an indispensable solution to close this practice gap; however, design and implementation barriers hinder CDS adoption and successful scaling across health systems. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) informed by PCOR evidence can be deployed using CDS systems to improve the evidence to practice gap. In the Scaling AcceptabLE cDs (SCALED) study, we will implement a VTE prevention CPG within an interoperable CDS system and evaluate both CPG effectiveness (improved clinical outcomes) and CDS implementation. Methods: The SCALED trial is a hybrid type 2 randomized stepped wedge effectiveness-implementation trial to scale the CDS across 4 heterogeneous healthcare systems. Trial outcomes will be assessed using the RE2-AIM planning and evaluation framework. Efforts will be made to ensure implementation consistency. Nonetheless, it is expected that CDS adoption will vary across each site. To assess these differences, we will evaluate implementation processes across trial sites using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) implementation framework (a determinant framework) using mixed-methods. Finally, it is critical that PCOR CPGs are maintained as evidence evolves. To date, an accepted process for evidence maintenance does not exist. We will pilot a “Living Guideline” process model for the VTE prevention CDS system. Discussion: The stepped wedge hybrid type 2 trial will provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of CDS based on the Berne-Norwood criteria for VTE prevention in patients with TBI. Additionally, it will provide evidence regarding a successful strategy to scale interoperable CDS systems across U.S. healthcare systems, advancing both the fields of implementation science and health informatics. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov– NCT05628207. Prospectively registered 11/28/2022, https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05628207.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number57
JournalImplementation Science
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Keywords

  • Clinical decision support
  • Health informatics
  • Implementation science
  • Learning health system
  • Mixed methods
  • Prophylaxis
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Stepped wedge
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Venous thromboembolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A pragmatic, stepped-wedge, hybrid type II trial of interoperable clinical decision support to improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for patients with traumatic brain injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this