A path to reconciliation between Indigenous and settler–colonial epistemologies

Joseph Gazing Wolf, Ellen Simmons, Paulette Blanchard, Lydia L. Jennings, Danielle D. Ignace, Dominique M. David-Chavez, Deondre Smiles, Michelle Montgomery, Ruth Plenty Sweetgrass-She Kills, Melissa K. Nelson, Diana Doan-Crider, Linda Black Elk, Luke Black Elk, Gwen Bridge, Ann Marie Chischilly, Kevin Deer, Kathy DeerinWater, Trudy Ecoffey, Judith Vergun, Daniel WildcatJames Rattling Leaf

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

There is a movement across settler–colonial institutions of education and research to engage with Indigenous Peoples and Knowledges. Many settler and Indigenous governments are pursuing pathways to move forward together to address global problems such as climate change. However, given the pervasive history of exploitation and displacement of Indigenous communities, this development has caused some concern among Indigenous leaders and scholars. At the 2022 Annual Meeting of the Ecological Society of America (ESA) in Montreal, Canada, the Traditional Ecological Knowledge Section of the ESA hosted a 2-day workshop. This gathering of 21 Indigenous environmental scientists included scholars from across the career and professional spectrum. By consensus, workshop participants identified three emergent themes—Engage, Heal, and Reconcile—that provide a pathway toward reconciliation between Indigenous and settler–colonial ways of knowing. This path allows for an ever-greater sharing of institutional resources and power toward a co-equal interfacing of Indigenous Knowledges and settler science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A path to reconciliation between Indigenous and settler–colonial epistemologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this