Abstract
Recent scholarship has found identity variables to be insignificant predictors of civilian targeting in war. Drawing on the European origins of the law of war, this article argues that previous scholarship has neglected the one specification of 'identity' that is most theoretically justified for understanding civilian targeting: whether a European state is fighting a non-European state. This article replicates and extends three recent statistical analyses - Downes; Valentino, Huth and Croco; and Morrow - of civilian targeting by including a variable capturing whether a European state fought a non-European state. The study finds that civilian targeting, and non compliance with the law of war more generally, is significantly more likely in European v. non-European dyads than in other types of dyads.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 829-851 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | British Journal of Political Science |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 13 2014 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014.