A novel preoperative risk score to optimize patient selection for performing concomitant liver resection with cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC

  • Rachel M. Lee
  • , Adriana C. Gamboa
  • , Michael K. Turgeon
  • , Mohammad Y. Zaidi
  • , Charles Kimbrough
  • , Jennifer Leiting
  • , Travis Grotz
  • , Andrew J. Lee
  • , Keith Fournier
  • , Benjamin Powers
  • , Sean Dineen
  • , Joel M. Baumgartner
  • , Jula Veerapong
  • , Harveshp Mogal
  • , Callisia Clarke
  • , Gregory Wilson
  • , Sameer Patel
  • , Ryan Hendrix
  • , Laura Lambert
  • , Courtney Pokrzywa
  • Daniel E. Abbott, Christopher J. LaRocca, Mustafa Raoof, Jonathan Greer, Fabian M. Johnston, Charles A. Staley, Jordan M. Cloyd, Shishir K. Maithel, Maria C. Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While parenchymal hepatic metastases were previously considered a contraindication to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), liver resection (LR) is increasingly performed with CRS/HIPEC.

METHODS: Patients from the US HIPEC Collaborative (2000-2017) with invasive appendiceal or colorectal adenocarcinoma undergoing primary, curative intent CRS/HIPEC with CC0-1 resection were included. LR was defined as a formal parenchymal resection. Primary endpoints were postoperative complications and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS: A total of 658 patients were included. About 83 (15%) underwent LR of colorectal (58%) or invasive appendiceal (42%) metastases. LR patients had more complications (81% vs. 60%; p = .001), greater number of complications (2.3 vs. 1.5; p < .001) per patient and required more reoperations (22% vs. 11%; p = .007) and readmissions (39% vs. 25%; p = .014) than non-LR patients. LR patients had decreased OS (2-year OS 62% vs. 79%, p < .001), even when accounting for peritoneal carcinomatosis index and histology type. Preoperative factors associated with decreased OS on multivariable analysis in LR patients included age < 60 years (HR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.10-11.81), colorectal histology (HR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.69-12.65), and multiple liver tumors (HR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.21-9.85) (all p < .05). When assigning one point for each factor, there was an incremental decrease in 2-year survival as the risk score increased from 0 to 3 (0: 100%; 1: 91%; 2: 58%; 3: 0%).

CONCLUSIONS: As CRS/HIPEC + LR has become more common, we created a simple risk score to stratify patients considered for CRS/HIPEC + LR. These data aid in striking the balance between an increased perioperative complication profile with the potential for improvement in OS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-195
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Surgical Oncology
Volume123
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC

Keywords

  • Appendiceal Neoplasms/pathology
  • Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion/mortality
  • Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/mortality
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hepatectomy/mortality
  • Humans
  • Hyperthermia, Induced/mortality
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Selection
  • Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary
  • Preoperative Care
  • Prognosis
  • Risk Factors
  • Survival Rate

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A novel preoperative risk score to optimize patient selection for performing concomitant liver resection with cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this