A new universal simplified adhesive

6-month clinical evaluation

Alexandra Mena-Serrano, Carlos Kose, Eloisa Andrade De Paula, Lidia Yileng Tay, Alessandra Reis, Alessandro D. Loguercio, Jorge Perdigao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Statement of the Problem Multimode adhesives, which can be used as etch-and-rinse or as self-etch adhesives, have been recently introduced without clinical data to back their use. Purpose of the Study To evaluate the 6-month clinical performance of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria. Methods/Materials Thirty-nine patients participated in this study. Two hundred restorations were assigned to four groups: SU-TEm: etch-and-rinse + moist dentin; SU-TEd: etch-and-rinse + dry dentin; SU-SEet: selective enamel etching; and SU-SE: self-etch. The composite resin Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE) was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months using both the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Statistical analyses were performed with Friedman repeated measures analysis of variance by rank and McNemar test for significance in each pair (α = 0.05). Results Only four restorations (SU-SE: 3 and SU-TEm: 1) were lost after 6 months (p > 0.05 for either criteria). Marginal discoloration occurred in one restoration in the SU-SE group (p > 0.05 for either criteria). Only 2/200 restorations were scored as bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHS criteria (one for SU-SE and one for SU-SEet, p > 0.05). However, when using the FDI criteria, the percentage of bravo scores for marginal adaptation at 6 months were 32%, 36%, 42%, and 46% for groups SU-TEm, SU-TEd, SU-SEet, and SU-SE, respectively (p > 0.05). Conclusions The clinical behavior of the multimode adhesive does not depend on the bonding strategy at 6 months. The FDI evaluation criteria are more sensitive than the USPHS criteria. Clinical Significance At 6 months, the clinical behavior of the new multimode adhesive Scotchbond Universal was found to be reliable when used in noncarious cervical lesions and may not depend on the bonding strategy employed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-69
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013

Fingerprint

tetrachloroisophthalonitrile
United States Public Health Service
Adhesives
Dentin
Composite Resins
Dental Enamel
Analysis of Variance
Tooth
Scotchbond

Cite this

Mena-Serrano, A., Kose, C., De Paula, E. A., Tay, L. Y., Reis, A., Loguercio, A. D., & Perdigao, J. (2013). A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 25(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12005

A new universal simplified adhesive : 6-month clinical evaluation. / Mena-Serrano, Alexandra; Kose, Carlos; De Paula, Eloisa Andrade; Tay, Lidia Yileng; Reis, Alessandra; Loguercio, Alessandro D.; Perdigao, Jorge.

In: Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.02.2013, p. 55-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mena-Serrano, A, Kose, C, De Paula, EA, Tay, LY, Reis, A, Loguercio, AD & Perdigao, J 2013, 'A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation', Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12005
Mena-Serrano A, Kose C, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2013 Feb 1;25(1):55-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12005
Mena-Serrano, Alexandra ; Kose, Carlos ; De Paula, Eloisa Andrade ; Tay, Lidia Yileng ; Reis, Alessandra ; Loguercio, Alessandro D. ; Perdigao, Jorge. / A new universal simplified adhesive : 6-month clinical evaluation. In: Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2013 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 55-69.
@article{bf52d98c04e84ad29d21624335fa9b6a,
title = "A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation",
abstract = "Statement of the Problem Multimode adhesives, which can be used as etch-and-rinse or as self-etch adhesives, have been recently introduced without clinical data to back their use. Purpose of the Study To evaluate the 6-month clinical performance of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria. Methods/Materials Thirty-nine patients participated in this study. Two hundred restorations were assigned to four groups: SU-TEm: etch-and-rinse + moist dentin; SU-TEd: etch-and-rinse + dry dentin; SU-SEet: selective enamel etching; and SU-SE: self-etch. The composite resin Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE) was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months using both the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Statistical analyses were performed with Friedman repeated measures analysis of variance by rank and McNemar test for significance in each pair (α = 0.05). Results Only four restorations (SU-SE: 3 and SU-TEm: 1) were lost after 6 months (p > 0.05 for either criteria). Marginal discoloration occurred in one restoration in the SU-SE group (p > 0.05 for either criteria). Only 2/200 restorations were scored as bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHS criteria (one for SU-SE and one for SU-SEet, p > 0.05). However, when using the FDI criteria, the percentage of bravo scores for marginal adaptation at 6 months were 32{\%}, 36{\%}, 42{\%}, and 46{\%} for groups SU-TEm, SU-TEd, SU-SEet, and SU-SE, respectively (p > 0.05). Conclusions The clinical behavior of the multimode adhesive does not depend on the bonding strategy at 6 months. The FDI evaluation criteria are more sensitive than the USPHS criteria. Clinical Significance At 6 months, the clinical behavior of the new multimode adhesive Scotchbond Universal was found to be reliable when used in noncarious cervical lesions and may not depend on the bonding strategy employed.",
author = "Alexandra Mena-Serrano and Carlos Kose and {De Paula}, {Eloisa Andrade} and Tay, {Lidia Yileng} and Alessandra Reis and Loguercio, {Alessandro D.} and Jorge Perdigao",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jerd.12005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "55--69",
journal = "Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry",
issn = "1496-4155",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new universal simplified adhesive

T2 - 6-month clinical evaluation

AU - Mena-Serrano, Alexandra

AU - Kose, Carlos

AU - De Paula, Eloisa Andrade

AU - Tay, Lidia Yileng

AU - Reis, Alessandra

AU - Loguercio, Alessandro D.

AU - Perdigao, Jorge

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Statement of the Problem Multimode adhesives, which can be used as etch-and-rinse or as self-etch adhesives, have been recently introduced without clinical data to back their use. Purpose of the Study To evaluate the 6-month clinical performance of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria. Methods/Materials Thirty-nine patients participated in this study. Two hundred restorations were assigned to four groups: SU-TEm: etch-and-rinse + moist dentin; SU-TEd: etch-and-rinse + dry dentin; SU-SEet: selective enamel etching; and SU-SE: self-etch. The composite resin Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE) was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months using both the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Statistical analyses were performed with Friedman repeated measures analysis of variance by rank and McNemar test for significance in each pair (α = 0.05). Results Only four restorations (SU-SE: 3 and SU-TEm: 1) were lost after 6 months (p > 0.05 for either criteria). Marginal discoloration occurred in one restoration in the SU-SE group (p > 0.05 for either criteria). Only 2/200 restorations were scored as bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHS criteria (one for SU-SE and one for SU-SEet, p > 0.05). However, when using the FDI criteria, the percentage of bravo scores for marginal adaptation at 6 months were 32%, 36%, 42%, and 46% for groups SU-TEm, SU-TEd, SU-SEet, and SU-SE, respectively (p > 0.05). Conclusions The clinical behavior of the multimode adhesive does not depend on the bonding strategy at 6 months. The FDI evaluation criteria are more sensitive than the USPHS criteria. Clinical Significance At 6 months, the clinical behavior of the new multimode adhesive Scotchbond Universal was found to be reliable when used in noncarious cervical lesions and may not depend on the bonding strategy employed.

AB - Statement of the Problem Multimode adhesives, which can be used as etch-and-rinse or as self-etch adhesives, have been recently introduced without clinical data to back their use. Purpose of the Study To evaluate the 6-month clinical performance of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria. Methods/Materials Thirty-nine patients participated in this study. Two hundred restorations were assigned to four groups: SU-TEm: etch-and-rinse + moist dentin; SU-TEd: etch-and-rinse + dry dentin; SU-SEet: selective enamel etching; and SU-SE: self-etch. The composite resin Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE) was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months using both the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Statistical analyses were performed with Friedman repeated measures analysis of variance by rank and McNemar test for significance in each pair (α = 0.05). Results Only four restorations (SU-SE: 3 and SU-TEm: 1) were lost after 6 months (p > 0.05 for either criteria). Marginal discoloration occurred in one restoration in the SU-SE group (p > 0.05 for either criteria). Only 2/200 restorations were scored as bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHS criteria (one for SU-SE and one for SU-SEet, p > 0.05). However, when using the FDI criteria, the percentage of bravo scores for marginal adaptation at 6 months were 32%, 36%, 42%, and 46% for groups SU-TEm, SU-TEd, SU-SEet, and SU-SE, respectively (p > 0.05). Conclusions The clinical behavior of the multimode adhesive does not depend on the bonding strategy at 6 months. The FDI evaluation criteria are more sensitive than the USPHS criteria. Clinical Significance At 6 months, the clinical behavior of the new multimode adhesive Scotchbond Universal was found to be reliable when used in noncarious cervical lesions and may not depend on the bonding strategy employed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873349914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873349914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jerd.12005

DO - 10.1111/jerd.12005

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 55

EP - 69

JO - Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

JF - Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

SN - 1496-4155

IS - 1

ER -