A new Universal simplified adhesive

18-month clinical evaluation

Jorge Perdigao, C. Kose, A. P. Mena-Serrano, E. A. De Paula, L. Y. Tay, A. Reis, A. D. Loguercio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

107 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the 18-month clinical performance of a multimode adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, SU, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria. Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine patients participated in this study. Two-hundred restorations were assigned to four groups: ERm, etch-and-rinse + moist dentin; ERd, etch-andrinse + dry dentin; Set, selective enamel etching; and SE, self-etch. The composite resin, Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE), was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, and at 18 months, using both the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using Friedman repeated-measures analysis of variance by rank and McNemar test for significance in each pair (α=0.05). Results: Five restorations (SE: 3; Set: 1; and ERm: 1) were lost after 18 months (p>0.05 for either criteria). Marginal staining occurred in four and 10% of the restorations evaluated (p>0.05), respectively, for USPHS and FDI criteria. Nine restorations were scored as bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHS criteria and 38%, 40%, 36%, and 44% for groups ERm, ERd, Set, and SE, respectively, when the FDI criteria were applied (p>0.05). However, when semiquantitative scores (or SQUACE) for marginal adaptation were used, SE resulted in a significantly greater number of restorations, with more than 30% of the total length of the interface showing marginal discrepancy (28%) in comparison with the other groups (8%, 6%, and 8%, respectively, for ERm, ERd, and Set). Conclusions: The clinical retention of the multimode adhesive at 18 months does not depend on the bonding strategy. The only differences between strategies were found for the parameter marginal adaptation, for which the FDI criteria were more sensitive than the USPHS criteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-127
Number of pages15
JournalOperative dentistry
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

United States Public Health Service
Adhesives
tetrachloroisophthalonitrile
Dentin
Composite Resins
Dental Enamel
Analysis of Variance
Tooth
Staining and Labeling

Cite this

Perdigao, J., Kose, C., Mena-Serrano, A. P., De Paula, E. A., Tay, L. Y., Reis, A., & Loguercio, A. D. (2014). A new Universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Operative dentistry, 39(2), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-045-C

A new Universal simplified adhesive : 18-month clinical evaluation. / Perdigao, Jorge; Kose, C.; Mena-Serrano, A. P.; De Paula, E. A.; Tay, L. Y.; Reis, A.; Loguercio, A. D.

In: Operative dentistry, Vol. 39, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 113-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Perdigao, J, Kose, C, Mena-Serrano, AP, De Paula, EA, Tay, LY, Reis, A & Loguercio, AD 2014, 'A new Universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation', Operative dentistry, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 113-127. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-045-C
Perdigao J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A et al. A new Universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Operative dentistry. 2014 Jan 1;39(2):113-127. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-045-C
Perdigao, Jorge ; Kose, C. ; Mena-Serrano, A. P. ; De Paula, E. A. ; Tay, L. Y. ; Reis, A. ; Loguercio, A. D. / A new Universal simplified adhesive : 18-month clinical evaluation. In: Operative dentistry. 2014 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 113-127.
@article{95dec8f75cd849adaa70fa0c7b5027f2,
title = "A new Universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the 18-month clinical performance of a multimode adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, SU, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria. Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine patients participated in this study. Two-hundred restorations were assigned to four groups: ERm, etch-and-rinse + moist dentin; ERd, etch-andrinse + dry dentin; Set, selective enamel etching; and SE, self-etch. The composite resin, Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE), was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, and at 18 months, using both the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using Friedman repeated-measures analysis of variance by rank and McNemar test for significance in each pair (α=0.05). Results: Five restorations (SE: 3; Set: 1; and ERm: 1) were lost after 18 months (p>0.05 for either criteria). Marginal staining occurred in four and 10{\%} of the restorations evaluated (p>0.05), respectively, for USPHS and FDI criteria. Nine restorations were scored as bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHS criteria and 38{\%}, 40{\%}, 36{\%}, and 44{\%} for groups ERm, ERd, Set, and SE, respectively, when the FDI criteria were applied (p>0.05). However, when semiquantitative scores (or SQUACE) for marginal adaptation were used, SE resulted in a significantly greater number of restorations, with more than 30{\%} of the total length of the interface showing marginal discrepancy (28{\%}) in comparison with the other groups (8{\%}, 6{\%}, and 8{\%}, respectively, for ERm, ERd, and Set). Conclusions: The clinical retention of the multimode adhesive at 18 months does not depend on the bonding strategy. The only differences between strategies were found for the parameter marginal adaptation, for which the FDI criteria were more sensitive than the USPHS criteria.",
author = "Jorge Perdigao and C. Kose and Mena-Serrano, {A. P.} and {De Paula}, {E. A.} and Tay, {L. Y.} and A. Reis and Loguercio, {A. D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2341/13-045-C",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "113--127",
journal = "Operative Dentistry",
issn = "0361-7734",
publisher = "Indiana University School of Dentistry",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new Universal simplified adhesive

T2 - 18-month clinical evaluation

AU - Perdigao, Jorge

AU - Kose, C.

AU - Mena-Serrano, A. P.

AU - De Paula, E. A.

AU - Tay, L. Y.

AU - Reis, A.

AU - Loguercio, A. D.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the 18-month clinical performance of a multimode adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, SU, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria. Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine patients participated in this study. Two-hundred restorations were assigned to four groups: ERm, etch-and-rinse + moist dentin; ERd, etch-andrinse + dry dentin; Set, selective enamel etching; and SE, self-etch. The composite resin, Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE), was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, and at 18 months, using both the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using Friedman repeated-measures analysis of variance by rank and McNemar test for significance in each pair (α=0.05). Results: Five restorations (SE: 3; Set: 1; and ERm: 1) were lost after 18 months (p>0.05 for either criteria). Marginal staining occurred in four and 10% of the restorations evaluated (p>0.05), respectively, for USPHS and FDI criteria. Nine restorations were scored as bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHS criteria and 38%, 40%, 36%, and 44% for groups ERm, ERd, Set, and SE, respectively, when the FDI criteria were applied (p>0.05). However, when semiquantitative scores (or SQUACE) for marginal adaptation were used, SE resulted in a significantly greater number of restorations, with more than 30% of the total length of the interface showing marginal discrepancy (28%) in comparison with the other groups (8%, 6%, and 8%, respectively, for ERm, ERd, and Set). Conclusions: The clinical retention of the multimode adhesive at 18 months does not depend on the bonding strategy. The only differences between strategies were found for the parameter marginal adaptation, for which the FDI criteria were more sensitive than the USPHS criteria.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the 18-month clinical performance of a multimode adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, SU, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria. Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine patients participated in this study. Two-hundred restorations were assigned to four groups: ERm, etch-and-rinse + moist dentin; ERd, etch-andrinse + dry dentin; Set, selective enamel etching; and SE, self-etch. The composite resin, Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE), was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, and at 18 months, using both the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using Friedman repeated-measures analysis of variance by rank and McNemar test for significance in each pair (α=0.05). Results: Five restorations (SE: 3; Set: 1; and ERm: 1) were lost after 18 months (p>0.05 for either criteria). Marginal staining occurred in four and 10% of the restorations evaluated (p>0.05), respectively, for USPHS and FDI criteria. Nine restorations were scored as bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHS criteria and 38%, 40%, 36%, and 44% for groups ERm, ERd, Set, and SE, respectively, when the FDI criteria were applied (p>0.05). However, when semiquantitative scores (or SQUACE) for marginal adaptation were used, SE resulted in a significantly greater number of restorations, with more than 30% of the total length of the interface showing marginal discrepancy (28%) in comparison with the other groups (8%, 6%, and 8%, respectively, for ERm, ERd, and Set). Conclusions: The clinical retention of the multimode adhesive at 18 months does not depend on the bonding strategy. The only differences between strategies were found for the parameter marginal adaptation, for which the FDI criteria were more sensitive than the USPHS criteria.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902171462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902171462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2341/13-045-C

DO - 10.2341/13-045-C

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 113

EP - 127

JO - Operative Dentistry

JF - Operative Dentistry

SN - 0361-7734

IS - 2

ER -