A new device for patellofemoral instrumented stress-testing provides good reliability and validity

Ana Leal, Renato Andrade, Betina B. Hinckel, Marc Tompkins, Paulo Flores, Filipe Silva, João Espregueira-Mendes, Elizabeth A Arendt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the reliability of an instrumented patellofemoral (PF) stress-testing—the Porto Patellofemoral Testing Device (PPTD)—and validate the instrumented assessment method comparing to manual physical examination. Methods: Eight asymptomatic volunteers underwent bilateral PF-instrumented examination with the PPTD and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess intra-rater reliability of the instrumented assessment methodology. Six patients with unilateral PF instability underwent physical examination and PPTD concomitantly with MRI. Manual examination was performed by two blinded surgeons and compared with PPTD test. Ligament stiffness was calculated and compared between injured and non-injured lower limbs. Results: PPTD showed a pre-determined and reproducible stress-force application with excellent intra-rater agreement (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.83–0.98). The manual exam was imprecise with variable examiner-dependent stress-force application. The PPTD resulted in greater lateral patellar translation (converted in quadrants) than manual exam for patients that have reached maximum translation force. Measurement of patellar position and displacement using PPTD was more accurate and precise than the visual estimation of translated quadrants by manual exam. Ligament stiffness curves showed no relevant changes in patellar displacement after 62 N. Conclusion: The PPTD instrumented stress-testing is a valid device to quantify PF position and displacement with high intra-rater reliability, showing more accuracy, more precision and less variability than physical examination. This device provides an accurate and objective measure to quantify the patellar movement which can augment the physical examination procedures and assist clinicians in the management of decision-making and in the assessment of post-treatment outcomes of PF pathological conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Equipment and Supplies
Physical Examination
Ligaments
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volunteers
Lower Extremity
Decision Making

Keywords

  • Arthrometer
  • Laxity
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Patellofemoral
  • Patellofemoral instability

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Cite this

A new device for patellofemoral instrumented stress-testing provides good reliability and validity. / Leal, Ana; Andrade, Renato; Hinckel, Betina B.; Tompkins, Marc; Flores, Paulo; Silva, Filipe; Espregueira-Mendes, João; Arendt, Elizabeth A.

In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leal, Ana ; Andrade, Renato ; Hinckel, Betina B. ; Tompkins, Marc ; Flores, Paulo ; Silva, Filipe ; Espregueira-Mendes, João ; Arendt, Elizabeth A. / A new device for patellofemoral instrumented stress-testing provides good reliability and validity. In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2019.
@article{35e801d194c64edcbacfb858fdab200b,
title = "A new device for patellofemoral instrumented stress-testing provides good reliability and validity",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the reliability of an instrumented patellofemoral (PF) stress-testing—the Porto Patellofemoral Testing Device (PPTD)—and validate the instrumented assessment method comparing to manual physical examination. Methods: Eight asymptomatic volunteers underwent bilateral PF-instrumented examination with the PPTD and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess intra-rater reliability of the instrumented assessment methodology. Six patients with unilateral PF instability underwent physical examination and PPTD concomitantly with MRI. Manual examination was performed by two blinded surgeons and compared with PPTD test. Ligament stiffness was calculated and compared between injured and non-injured lower limbs. Results: PPTD showed a pre-determined and reproducible stress-force application with excellent intra-rater agreement (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.83–0.98). The manual exam was imprecise with variable examiner-dependent stress-force application. The PPTD resulted in greater lateral patellar translation (converted in quadrants) than manual exam for patients that have reached maximum translation force. Measurement of patellar position and displacement using PPTD was more accurate and precise than the visual estimation of translated quadrants by manual exam. Ligament stiffness curves showed no relevant changes in patellar displacement after 62 N. Conclusion: The PPTD instrumented stress-testing is a valid device to quantify PF position and displacement with high intra-rater reliability, showing more accuracy, more precision and less variability than physical examination. This device provides an accurate and objective measure to quantify the patellar movement which can augment the physical examination procedures and assist clinicians in the management of decision-making and in the assessment of post-treatment outcomes of PF pathological conditions.",
keywords = "Arthrometer, Laxity, Magnetic resonance imaging, Patellofemoral, Patellofemoral instability",
author = "Ana Leal and Renato Andrade and Hinckel, {Betina B.} and Marc Tompkins and Paulo Flores and Filipe Silva and Jo{\~a}o Espregueira-Mendes and Arendt, {Elizabeth A}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00167-019-05601-4",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy",
issn = "0942-2056",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new device for patellofemoral instrumented stress-testing provides good reliability and validity

AU - Leal, Ana

AU - Andrade, Renato

AU - Hinckel, Betina B.

AU - Tompkins, Marc

AU - Flores, Paulo

AU - Silva, Filipe

AU - Espregueira-Mendes, João

AU - Arendt, Elizabeth A

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the reliability of an instrumented patellofemoral (PF) stress-testing—the Porto Patellofemoral Testing Device (PPTD)—and validate the instrumented assessment method comparing to manual physical examination. Methods: Eight asymptomatic volunteers underwent bilateral PF-instrumented examination with the PPTD and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess intra-rater reliability of the instrumented assessment methodology. Six patients with unilateral PF instability underwent physical examination and PPTD concomitantly with MRI. Manual examination was performed by two blinded surgeons and compared with PPTD test. Ligament stiffness was calculated and compared between injured and non-injured lower limbs. Results: PPTD showed a pre-determined and reproducible stress-force application with excellent intra-rater agreement (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.83–0.98). The manual exam was imprecise with variable examiner-dependent stress-force application. The PPTD resulted in greater lateral patellar translation (converted in quadrants) than manual exam for patients that have reached maximum translation force. Measurement of patellar position and displacement using PPTD was more accurate and precise than the visual estimation of translated quadrants by manual exam. Ligament stiffness curves showed no relevant changes in patellar displacement after 62 N. Conclusion: The PPTD instrumented stress-testing is a valid device to quantify PF position and displacement with high intra-rater reliability, showing more accuracy, more precision and less variability than physical examination. This device provides an accurate and objective measure to quantify the patellar movement which can augment the physical examination procedures and assist clinicians in the management of decision-making and in the assessment of post-treatment outcomes of PF pathological conditions.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the reliability of an instrumented patellofemoral (PF) stress-testing—the Porto Patellofemoral Testing Device (PPTD)—and validate the instrumented assessment method comparing to manual physical examination. Methods: Eight asymptomatic volunteers underwent bilateral PF-instrumented examination with the PPTD and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess intra-rater reliability of the instrumented assessment methodology. Six patients with unilateral PF instability underwent physical examination and PPTD concomitantly with MRI. Manual examination was performed by two blinded surgeons and compared with PPTD test. Ligament stiffness was calculated and compared between injured and non-injured lower limbs. Results: PPTD showed a pre-determined and reproducible stress-force application with excellent intra-rater agreement (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.83–0.98). The manual exam was imprecise with variable examiner-dependent stress-force application. The PPTD resulted in greater lateral patellar translation (converted in quadrants) than manual exam for patients that have reached maximum translation force. Measurement of patellar position and displacement using PPTD was more accurate and precise than the visual estimation of translated quadrants by manual exam. Ligament stiffness curves showed no relevant changes in patellar displacement after 62 N. Conclusion: The PPTD instrumented stress-testing is a valid device to quantify PF position and displacement with high intra-rater reliability, showing more accuracy, more precision and less variability than physical examination. This device provides an accurate and objective measure to quantify the patellar movement which can augment the physical examination procedures and assist clinicians in the management of decision-making and in the assessment of post-treatment outcomes of PF pathological conditions.

KW - Arthrometer

KW - Laxity

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Patellofemoral

KW - Patellofemoral instability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068173223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068173223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00167-019-05601-4

DO - 10.1007/s00167-019-05601-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 31250058

AN - SCOPUS:85068173223

JO - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

JF - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

SN - 0942-2056

ER -