Abstract
Kohlberg's work in moral judgement has been criticised by many philosophers and psychologists. Building on Kohlberg's core assumptions, we propose a model of moral judgement (hereafter the neo-Kohlbergian approach) that addresses these concerns. Using 25 years of data gathered with the Defining Issues Test (DIT), we present an overview of Minnesota's neo-Kohlbergian approach, using Kohlberg's basic starting points, ideas from Cognitive Science (especially schema theory), and developments in moral philosophy.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 381-395 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of Moral Education |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2000 |