A Meta-Analysis into Multiscreening and Advertising Effectiveness: Direct Effects, Moderators, and Underlying Mechanisms

Claire M Segijn, Martin Eisend

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Using another media screen while watching television has become a part of people’s daily routines. The topic of multiscreening has thus received increased attention from advertising scholars in recent years. To gain a better theoretical understanding of the circumstances under which multiscreening effects occur and to offer practical guidelines to advertisers, the current study synthesizes the results of past studies on multiscreening and advertising and examines the direct effects of multiscreening on both cognitive and affective advertising outcomes, the possible moderators of those effects, and the underlying mechanisms of multiscreening with regard to advertising outcomes. The results indicate a negative direct effect of multiscreening on cognitive outcomes. The effect is weakened, however, by factors related to research, advertising, and media. In addition, the results show no direct or total effect of multiscreening on affective advertising outcomes, but this again depends on various media-, advertising-, and research-related factors. Finally, the results show that attention, enjoyment, and resistance constitute the underlying mechanisms that explain the effect of multiscreening on memory and persuasion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)313-332
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Advertising
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 27 2019

Fingerprint

advertising effectiveness
Moderators
moderator
Marketing
advertising medium
persuasion
Direct effect
Advertising effectiveness
Moderator
Meta-analysis
Television
television
Data storage equipment

Cite this

A Meta-Analysis into Multiscreening and Advertising Effectiveness : Direct Effects, Moderators, and Underlying Mechanisms. / Segijn, Claire M; Eisend, Martin.

In: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 48, No. 3, 27.05.2019, p. 313-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b7abf6ed66848dbaaf971947c1092ac,
title = "A Meta-Analysis into Multiscreening and Advertising Effectiveness: Direct Effects, Moderators, and Underlying Mechanisms",
abstract = "Using another media screen while watching television has become a part of people’s daily routines. The topic of multiscreening has thus received increased attention from advertising scholars in recent years. To gain a better theoretical understanding of the circumstances under which multiscreening effects occur and to offer practical guidelines to advertisers, the current study synthesizes the results of past studies on multiscreening and advertising and examines the direct effects of multiscreening on both cognitive and affective advertising outcomes, the possible moderators of those effects, and the underlying mechanisms of multiscreening with regard to advertising outcomes. The results indicate a negative direct effect of multiscreening on cognitive outcomes. The effect is weakened, however, by factors related to research, advertising, and media. In addition, the results show no direct or total effect of multiscreening on affective advertising outcomes, but this again depends on various media-, advertising-, and research-related factors. Finally, the results show that attention, enjoyment, and resistance constitute the underlying mechanisms that explain the effect of multiscreening on memory and persuasion.",
author = "Segijn, {Claire M} and Martin Eisend",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1080/00913367.2019.1604009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "313--332",
journal = "Journal of Advertising",
issn = "0091-3367",
publisher = "M.E. Sharpe Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Meta-Analysis into Multiscreening and Advertising Effectiveness

T2 - Direct Effects, Moderators, and Underlying Mechanisms

AU - Segijn, Claire M

AU - Eisend, Martin

PY - 2019/5/27

Y1 - 2019/5/27

N2 - Using another media screen while watching television has become a part of people’s daily routines. The topic of multiscreening has thus received increased attention from advertising scholars in recent years. To gain a better theoretical understanding of the circumstances under which multiscreening effects occur and to offer practical guidelines to advertisers, the current study synthesizes the results of past studies on multiscreening and advertising and examines the direct effects of multiscreening on both cognitive and affective advertising outcomes, the possible moderators of those effects, and the underlying mechanisms of multiscreening with regard to advertising outcomes. The results indicate a negative direct effect of multiscreening on cognitive outcomes. The effect is weakened, however, by factors related to research, advertising, and media. In addition, the results show no direct or total effect of multiscreening on affective advertising outcomes, but this again depends on various media-, advertising-, and research-related factors. Finally, the results show that attention, enjoyment, and resistance constitute the underlying mechanisms that explain the effect of multiscreening on memory and persuasion.

AB - Using another media screen while watching television has become a part of people’s daily routines. The topic of multiscreening has thus received increased attention from advertising scholars in recent years. To gain a better theoretical understanding of the circumstances under which multiscreening effects occur and to offer practical guidelines to advertisers, the current study synthesizes the results of past studies on multiscreening and advertising and examines the direct effects of multiscreening on both cognitive and affective advertising outcomes, the possible moderators of those effects, and the underlying mechanisms of multiscreening with regard to advertising outcomes. The results indicate a negative direct effect of multiscreening on cognitive outcomes. The effect is weakened, however, by factors related to research, advertising, and media. In addition, the results show no direct or total effect of multiscreening on affective advertising outcomes, but this again depends on various media-, advertising-, and research-related factors. Finally, the results show that attention, enjoyment, and resistance constitute the underlying mechanisms that explain the effect of multiscreening on memory and persuasion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067676241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067676241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00913367.2019.1604009

DO - 10.1080/00913367.2019.1604009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067676241

VL - 48

SP - 313

EP - 332

JO - Journal of Advertising

JF - Journal of Advertising

SN - 0091-3367

IS - 3

ER -