Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A majorization–minimization algorithm for split feasibility problems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The classical multi-set split feasibility problem seeks a point in the intersection of finitely many closed convex domain constraints, whose image under a linear mapping also lies in the intersection of finitely many closed convex range constraints. Split feasibility generalizes important inverse problems including convex feasibility, linear complementarity, and regression with constraint sets. When a feasible point does not exist, solution methods that proceed by minimizing a proximity function can be used to obtain optimal approximate solutions to the problem. We present an extension of the proximity function approach that generalizes the linear split feasibility problem to allow for non-linear mappings. Our algorithm is based on the principle of majorization–minimization, is amenable to quasi-Newton acceleration, and comes complete with convergence guarantees under mild assumptions. Furthermore, we show that the Euclidean norm appearing in the proximity function of the non-linear split feasibility problem can be replaced by arbitrary Bregman divergences. We explore several examples illustrating the merits of non-linear formulations over the linear case, with a focus on optimization for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)795-828
Number of pages34
JournalComputational Optimization and Applications
Volume71
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

  • Constrained regression
  • Intensity modulated radiation therapy
  • Majorize–minimize
  • Nonlinear split feasibility
  • Proximity function minimization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A majorization–minimization algorithm for split feasibility problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this