TY - JOUR
T1 - A low response rate does not necessarily indicate non-response bias in gastroenterology survey research
T2 - A population-based study
AU - Choung, Rok Seon
AU - Locke, G. Richard
AU - Schleck, Cathy D.
AU - Ziegenfuss, Jeanette Y.
AU - Beebe, Timothy J.
AU - Zinsmeister, Alan R.
AU - Talley, Nicholas J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial Support This study was made possible in part by the Rochester Epidemiology Project (Grant no. R01-AR30582 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases).
PY - 2013/2
Y1 - 2013/2
N2 - Aim: To estimate the potential for response bias in standard mailed questionnaires used in surveys of GI symptoms in a community. Subjects and methods: Validated self-report tools have been developed to measure functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders but response rates in community surveys have been rapidly declining in many parts of the world. Whether a lower community response rate introduces significant response bias in GI survey research is unknown. A questionnaire was mailed to a total of 5,069 randomly selected subjects. The overall response rate was 52 %. A random sample of 723 of these subjects (428 responders and 295 non-responders, stratified by age and gender) was selected for medical record abstraction (including both inpatient and outpatient history). Results: The odds for response increased in those with a higher body mass index (odds ratio (OR):1.02 [95 % CI: 1.01, 1.03]), more health care seeking behavior for non-GI problems (OR: 1.97 [95 % CI: 1.43, 2.72]), and for those who had responded to a previous survey (OR: 4.84 [95 % CI: 2.84, 8.26]). Responder status was not significantly associated with any GI symptoms or a diagnosis of GI or non-GI disease (with two exceptions, diverticulosis and skin disease). Conclusions: Despite a response rate of only 52 %, the results of a community-based GI survey do not appear to be impacted by non-response bias in a major way. A low survey response rate does not necessarily indicate non-response bias.
AB - Aim: To estimate the potential for response bias in standard mailed questionnaires used in surveys of GI symptoms in a community. Subjects and methods: Validated self-report tools have been developed to measure functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders but response rates in community surveys have been rapidly declining in many parts of the world. Whether a lower community response rate introduces significant response bias in GI survey research is unknown. A questionnaire was mailed to a total of 5,069 randomly selected subjects. The overall response rate was 52 %. A random sample of 723 of these subjects (428 responders and 295 non-responders, stratified by age and gender) was selected for medical record abstraction (including both inpatient and outpatient history). Results: The odds for response increased in those with a higher body mass index (odds ratio (OR):1.02 [95 % CI: 1.01, 1.03]), more health care seeking behavior for non-GI problems (OR: 1.97 [95 % CI: 1.43, 2.72]), and for those who had responded to a previous survey (OR: 4.84 [95 % CI: 2.84, 8.26]). Responder status was not significantly associated with any GI symptoms or a diagnosis of GI or non-GI disease (with two exceptions, diverticulosis and skin disease). Conclusions: Despite a response rate of only 52 %, the results of a community-based GI survey do not appear to be impacted by non-response bias in a major way. A low survey response rate does not necessarily indicate non-response bias.
KW - Bias
KW - Gastrointestinal surveys
KW - Population
KW - Response
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872840599&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872840599&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10389-012-0513-z
DO - 10.1007/s10389-012-0513-z
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84872840599
SN - 0943-1853
VL - 21
SP - 87
EP - 95
JO - Journal of Public Health (Germany)
JF - Journal of Public Health (Germany)
IS - 1
ER -