A large multicenter cohort on the use of full-thickness resection device for difficult colonic lesions

  • Y. Ichkhanian
  • , K. Vosoughi
  • , D. L. Diehl
  • , I. S. Grimm
  • , T. W. James
  • , A. W. Templeton
  • , K. Hajifathalian
  • , J. L. Tokar
  • , J. B. Samarasena
  • , N. El Hage Chehade
  • , J. Lee
  • , K. Chang
  • , M. Mizrahi
  • , M. Barawi
  • , S. Irani
  • , S. Friedland
  • , P. Korc
  • , A. A. Aadam
  • , M. A. Al-Haddad
  • , T. E. Kowalski
  • A. Novikov, G. Smallfield, G. G. Ginsberg, V. M. Oza, D. Panuu, N. Fukami, H. Pohl, Michael Lajin, N. A. Kumta, S. J. Tang, Y. M. Naga, S. K. Amateau, G. O.I. Brewer, V. Kumbhari, R. Sharaiha, Mouen A. Khashab

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Introduction of the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) has allowed endoscopic resection of difficult lesions such as those with deep wall origin/infiltration or those located in difficult anatomic locations. The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of the FTRD among its early users in the USA. Methods: Patients who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) for lower gastrointestinal tract lesions using the FTRD at 26 US tertiary care centers between 10/2017 and 12/2018 were included. Primary outcome was R0 resection rate. Secondary outcomes included rate of technical success (en bloc resection), achievement of histologic full-thickness resection (FTR), and adverse events (AE). Results: A total of 95 patients (mean age 65.5 ± 12.6 year, 38.9% F) were included. The most common indication, for use of FTRD, was resection of difficult adenomas (non-lifting, recurrent, residual, or involving appendiceal orifice/diverticular opening) (66.3%), followed by adenocarcinomas (22.1%), and subepithelial tumors (SET) (11.6%). Lesions were located in the proximal colon (61.1%), distal colon (18.9%), or rectum (20%). Mean lesion diameter was 15.5 ± 6.4 mm and 61.1% had a prior resection attempt. The mean total procedure time was 59.7 ± 31.8 min. R0 resection was achieved in 82.7% while technical success was achieved in 84.2%. Histologically FTR was demonstrated in 88.1% of patients. There were five clinical AE (5.3%) with 2 (2.1%) requiring surgical intervention. Conclusions: Results from this first US multicenter study suggest that EFTR with the FTRD is a technically feasible, safe, and effective technique for resecting difficult colonic lesions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1296-1306
Number of pages11
JournalSurgical endoscopy
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 16 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

  • Difficult adenomas
  • Endoscopic full-thickness resection
  • FTRD
  • Full-thickness resection device

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A large multicenter cohort on the use of full-thickness resection device for difficult colonic lesions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this