A humean approach to the boundaries of morality

Mark Collier

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    Hume maintains that the boundaries of morality are widely drawn in everyday life. We routinely blame characters for traits that we find disgusting, on this account, as well as those which we perceive as being harmful. Contemporary moral psychology provides further evidence that human beings have a natural tendency to moralize traits that produce feelings of repugnance. But recent work also demonstrates a significant amount of individual variation in our sensitivities to disgust. We have sufficient reason to bracket this emotion, therefore, when adopting the general point of view: if we allow idiosyncratic affective responses to shape our fully considered moral judgments, we could no longer reasonably expect spectators with different sensitivities to agree with us.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1-16
    Number of pages16
    JournalJournal of Scottish Philosophy
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - Mar 2020

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © Edinburgh University Press.

    Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.


    • Disgust
    • Hume
    • Moral disagreement
    • Moral domain
    • Sentimentalism


    Dive into the research topics of 'A humean approach to the boundaries of morality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this