Abstract
Regression models are often used to analyze discrete outcomes, but classical goodness-of-fit tests such as those based on the deviance or Pearson's statistic can be misleading or have little power in this context. To address this issue, we propose a new test, inspired by the work of Czado et al. (Biometrics, 65(4):1254–1261, 2009), which involves no randomization, tuning parameter, or binning of covariates. The statistic's large-sample distribution under the null hypothesis is determined; as it involves unknown parameter values, one must resort to a bootstrap procedure to compute (Formula presented.) -values. Simulations are conducted to investigate the ability of the test to detect a broad range of model misspecifications commonly seen in practice. The proposed procedure is seen to perform well in all the scenarios considered as well as on real data.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | e70046 |
| Journal | Canadian Journal of Statistics |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 The Author(s). The Canadian Journal of Statistics|La revue canadienne de statistique published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Statistical Society of Canada | Société statistique du Canada.
Keywords
- Discrete outcomes
- generalized linear model
- goodness of fit
- model diagnostics
- residual
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A goodness-of-fit test for regression models with discrete outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS