A fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device - Final report

M. R. Mehra, N. Uriel, Y. Naka, J. C. Cleveland, M. Yuzefpolskaya, C. T. Salerno, M. N. Walsh, C. A. Milano, C. B. Patel, S. W. Hutchins, J. Ransom, G. A. Ewald, A. Itoh, N. Y. Raval, S. C. Silvestry, R. Cogswell, R. John, A. Bhimaraj, B. A. Bruckner, B. D. LowesJ. Y. Um, V. Jeevanandam, G. Sayer, A. A. Mangi, E. J. Molina, F. Sheikh, K. Aaronson, F. D. Pagani, W. G. Cotts, A. J. Tatooles, A. Babu, D. Chomsky, J. N. Katz, P. B. Tessmann, D. Dean, A. Krishnamoorthy, J. Chuang, I. Topuria, P. Sood, D. J. Goldstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

735 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In two interim analyses of this trial, patients with advanced heart failure who were treated with a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device were less likely to have pump thrombosis or nondisabling stroke than were patients treated with a mechanical-bearing axial-flow left ventricular assist device.

METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with advanced heart failure to receive either the centrifugal-flow pump or the axial-flow pump irrespective of the intended goal of use (bridge to transplantation or destination therapy). The composite primary end point was survival at 2 years free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device. The principal secondary end point was pump replacement at 2 years.

RESULTS: This final analysis included 1028 enrolled patients: 516 in the centrifugal-flow pump group and 512 in the axial-flow pump group. In the analysis of the primary end point, 397 patients (76.9%) in the centrifugal-flow pump group, as compared with 332 (64.8%) in the axial-flow pump group, remained alive and free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device at 2 years (relative risk, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.91; P<0.001 for superiority). Pump replacement was less common in the centrifugal-flow pump group than in the axial-flow pump group (12 patients [2.3%] vs. 57 patients [11.3%]; relative risk, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.38; P<0.001). The numbers of events per patient-year for stroke of any severity, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage were lower in the centrifugal-flow pump group than in the axial-flow pump group.

CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with advanced heart failure, a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device was associated with less frequent need for pump replacement than an axial-flow device and was superior with respect to survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device. (Funded by Abbott; MOMENTUM 3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02224755.).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1618-1627
Number of pages10
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume380
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 25 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Female
  • Heart Failure/therapy
  • Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Intention to Treat Analysis
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Reoperation/statistics & numerical data
  • Stroke/etiology

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Equivalence Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device - Final report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this