TY - JOUR
T1 - A finite element study on the risk of bone loss around posterior short implants in an atrophic mandible
AU - Gialain, Ivan Onone
AU - Gantier-Takano, Marlene Kasumi
AU - Silva, Leonardo Folmer Rodrigues da
AU - Roscoe, Marina Guimarães
AU - Pinhata-Baptista, Otavio Henrique
AU - Meira, Josete Barbosa Cruz
AU - Fok, Alex Siu Lun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Japan Prosthodontic Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/1/10
Y1 - 2025/1/10
N2 - PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of bone loss around single short molar crown-supporting implants in an atrophic mandible. METHODS: Implants of different lengths (L = 4 or 6 mm) and diameters (Ø = 4.1 or 4.8 mm) were placed in the molar area of an atrophic mandible. Additional control mandible models were simulated for 4.1 mm diameter implants (L = 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm). A vertical masticatory load of 200 N was applied to three or six occlusal contact areas (3ca or 6ca) of the prosthetic crown. The bone strain energy density (SED) of 109.6 µJ/mm3 was assumed to be the pathological threshold for cortical bone. The peri-implant bone resorption risk index (PIBRri) was calculated by dividing the maximum SED of the crestal cortical bone by the SED pathological threshold. RESULTS: Increasing the implant length from 4 to 6 mm, implant diameter from 4.1 to 4.8 mm, and number of contact areas from 3 to 6 reduced the SED and PIBRri values by approximately 20%, 35%, and 40%, respectively, when comparing pairs of models that isolated a specific variable. All models with 6ca had a low bone resorption risk (PIBRri<0.8), while the Ø4.1 short implant with 3ca had a medium (0.8≤PIBRri≤1.0) or high (PIBRri>1.0) resorption risk. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the diameter or occlusal contact area of a 4 mm short implant in an atrophic mandible resulted in reduced bone resorption risks, similar to or lower than those observed in a regular mandible with standard-length implants.
AB - PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of bone loss around single short molar crown-supporting implants in an atrophic mandible. METHODS: Implants of different lengths (L = 4 or 6 mm) and diameters (Ø = 4.1 or 4.8 mm) were placed in the molar area of an atrophic mandible. Additional control mandible models were simulated for 4.1 mm diameter implants (L = 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm). A vertical masticatory load of 200 N was applied to three or six occlusal contact areas (3ca or 6ca) of the prosthetic crown. The bone strain energy density (SED) of 109.6 µJ/mm3 was assumed to be the pathological threshold for cortical bone. The peri-implant bone resorption risk index (PIBRri) was calculated by dividing the maximum SED of the crestal cortical bone by the SED pathological threshold. RESULTS: Increasing the implant length from 4 to 6 mm, implant diameter from 4.1 to 4.8 mm, and number of contact areas from 3 to 6 reduced the SED and PIBRri values by approximately 20%, 35%, and 40%, respectively, when comparing pairs of models that isolated a specific variable. All models with 6ca had a low bone resorption risk (PIBRri<0.8), while the Ø4.1 short implant with 3ca had a medium (0.8≤PIBRri≤1.0) or high (PIBRri>1.0) resorption risk. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the diameter or occlusal contact area of a 4 mm short implant in an atrophic mandible resulted in reduced bone resorption risks, similar to or lower than those observed in a regular mandible with standard-length implants.
KW - Bone resorption
KW - Dental implant
KW - Dental prostheses
KW - Mandible
KW - Occlusal load
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85215647672&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85215647672&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_24_00003
DO - 10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_24_00003
M3 - Article
C2 - 39019591
AN - SCOPUS:85215647672
SN - 1883-1958
VL - 69
SP - 110
EP - 119
JO - Journal of Prosthodontic Research
JF - Journal of Prosthodontic Research
IS - 1
ER -