TY - JOUR
T1 - A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of amphotericin B colloidal dispersion versus amphotericin B for treatment of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients
AU - Bowden, Raleigh
AU - Chandrasekar, Pranatharthi
AU - White, Mary H.
AU - Li, Xin
AU - Pietrelli, Larry
AU - Gurwith, Marc
AU - Van Burik, Jo Anne
AU - Laverdiere, Michel
AU - Safrin, Sharon
AU - Wingard, John R.
PY - 2002/8/15
Y1 - 2002/8/15
N2 - We report a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in which amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD [Amphotec]; 6 mg/kg/day) was compared with amphotericin B (AmB; 1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day) for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in 174 patients. For evaluable patients in the ABCD and AmB treatment groups, respective rates of therapeutic response (52% vs. 51%; P = 1.0), mortality (36% vs. 45%; P = .4), and death due to fungal infection (32% vs. 26%; P = .7) were similar. Renal toxicity was lower (25% vs. 49%; P = .002) and the median time to onset of nephrotoxicity was longer (301 vs. 22 days; P < .001) in patients treated with ABCD. Rates of drug-related toxicity in patients receiving ABCD and AmB, respectively, were 53% versus 30% (chills), 27% versus 16% (fever), 1% versus 4% (hypoxia) and 22% versus 24% (toxicity requiring study drug discontinuation). ABCD appears to have equivalent efficacy and superior renal safety, compared with AmB, in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. However, infusion-related chills and fever occurred more frequently in patients receiving ABCD than in those receiving AmB.
AB - We report a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in which amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD [Amphotec]; 6 mg/kg/day) was compared with amphotericin B (AmB; 1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day) for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in 174 patients. For evaluable patients in the ABCD and AmB treatment groups, respective rates of therapeutic response (52% vs. 51%; P = 1.0), mortality (36% vs. 45%; P = .4), and death due to fungal infection (32% vs. 26%; P = .7) were similar. Renal toxicity was lower (25% vs. 49%; P = .002) and the median time to onset of nephrotoxicity was longer (301 vs. 22 days; P < .001) in patients treated with ABCD. Rates of drug-related toxicity in patients receiving ABCD and AmB, respectively, were 53% versus 30% (chills), 27% versus 16% (fever), 1% versus 4% (hypoxia) and 22% versus 24% (toxicity requiring study drug discontinuation). ABCD appears to have equivalent efficacy and superior renal safety, compared with AmB, in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. However, infusion-related chills and fever occurred more frequently in patients receiving ABCD than in those receiving AmB.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037103116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037103116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/341401
DO - 10.1086/341401
M3 - Article
C2 - 12145716
AN - SCOPUS:0037103116
SN - 1058-4838
VL - 35
SP - 359
EP - 366
JO - Clinical Infectious Diseases
JF - Clinical Infectious Diseases
IS - 4
ER -