A discriminated rapid-acquisition laboratory procedure for human continuous choice

Bryan Klapes, Olivia L. Calvin, J. J. McDowell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Previous continuous choice laboratory procedures for human participants are either prohibitively time-intensive or result in inadequate fits of the generalized matching law (GML). We developed a rapid-acquisition laboratory procedure (Procedure for Rapidly Establishing Steady-State Behavior, or PRESS-B) for studying human continuous choice that reduces participant burden and produces data that is well-described by the GML. To test the procedure, 27 human participants were exposed to 9 independent concurrent random-interval random-interval reinforcement schedules over the course of a single, 37-min session. Fits of the GML to the participants' data accounted for large proportions of variance (median R2: 0.94), with parameter estimates that were similar to those previously found in human continuous choice studies [median a: 0.67; median log(b): -0.02]. In summary, PRESS-B generates human continuous choice behavior in the laboratory that conforms to the GML with limited experimental duration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)142-159
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Volume114
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Keywords

  • human operant
  • matching law
  • random-interval schedules
  • rapid-acquisition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A discriminated rapid-acquisition laboratory procedure for human continuous choice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this