A delicate balance: Integrating active learning into a large lecture course

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A lecture section of introductory biology that historically enrolled more than 500 students was split into two smaller sections of approximately 250 students each. A traditional lecture format was followed in the "traditional" section; lecture time in the "active" section was drastically reduced in favor of a variety of in-class student-centered activities. Students in both sections took unannounced quizzes and multiple-choice exams. Evaluation consisted of comparisons of student survey responses, scores on standardized teaching evaluation forms, section averages and attendance, and open-ended student comments on end-of-term surveys. Results demonstrate that students perform as well, if not better, in an active versus traditional environment. However, student concerns about instructor expectations indicate that a judicious balance of student-centered activities and presentation-style instruction may be the best approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)361-367
Number of pages7
JournalCBE life sciences education
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008

Fingerprint

Problem-Based Learning
Students
learning
student
quiz
evaluation
biology
instructor
Teaching
instruction

Cite this

@article{cb14cc1e66eb44febffef401a2ad1257,
title = "A delicate balance: Integrating active learning into a large lecture course",
abstract = "A lecture section of introductory biology that historically enrolled more than 500 students was split into two smaller sections of approximately 250 students each. A traditional lecture format was followed in the {"}traditional{"} section; lecture time in the {"}active{"} section was drastically reduced in favor of a variety of in-class student-centered activities. Students in both sections took unannounced quizzes and multiple-choice exams. Evaluation consisted of comparisons of student survey responses, scores on standardized teaching evaluation forms, section averages and attendance, and open-ended student comments on end-of-term surveys. Results demonstrate that students perform as well, if not better, in an active versus traditional environment. However, student concerns about instructor expectations indicate that a judicious balance of student-centered activities and presentation-style instruction may be the best approach.",
author = "Walker, {J D} and Cotner, {Sehoya H} and Baepler, {Paul M} and Decker, {Mark D}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1187/cbe.08-02-0004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "361--367",
journal = "CBE Life Sciences Education",
issn = "1931-7913",
publisher = "American Society for Cell Biology",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A delicate balance

T2 - Integrating active learning into a large lecture course

AU - Walker, J D

AU - Cotner, Sehoya H

AU - Baepler, Paul M

AU - Decker, Mark D

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - A lecture section of introductory biology that historically enrolled more than 500 students was split into two smaller sections of approximately 250 students each. A traditional lecture format was followed in the "traditional" section; lecture time in the "active" section was drastically reduced in favor of a variety of in-class student-centered activities. Students in both sections took unannounced quizzes and multiple-choice exams. Evaluation consisted of comparisons of student survey responses, scores on standardized teaching evaluation forms, section averages and attendance, and open-ended student comments on end-of-term surveys. Results demonstrate that students perform as well, if not better, in an active versus traditional environment. However, student concerns about instructor expectations indicate that a judicious balance of student-centered activities and presentation-style instruction may be the best approach.

AB - A lecture section of introductory biology that historically enrolled more than 500 students was split into two smaller sections of approximately 250 students each. A traditional lecture format was followed in the "traditional" section; lecture time in the "active" section was drastically reduced in favor of a variety of in-class student-centered activities. Students in both sections took unannounced quizzes and multiple-choice exams. Evaluation consisted of comparisons of student survey responses, scores on standardized teaching evaluation forms, section averages and attendance, and open-ended student comments on end-of-term surveys. Results demonstrate that students perform as well, if not better, in an active versus traditional environment. However, student concerns about instructor expectations indicate that a judicious balance of student-centered activities and presentation-style instruction may be the best approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57349139477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57349139477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1187/cbe.08-02-0004

DO - 10.1187/cbe.08-02-0004

M3 - Article

C2 - 19047423

AN - SCOPUS:57349139477

VL - 7

SP - 361

EP - 367

JO - CBE Life Sciences Education

JF - CBE Life Sciences Education

SN - 1931-7913

IS - 4

ER -